From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-54048-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D45521381F4
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 11:08:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4317A21C001;
	Wed, 15 Aug 2012 11:08:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from hera.cwi.nl (hera.cwi.nl [192.16.191.8])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D77721C056
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 11:07:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from gentoo.org (sofia.ins.cwi.nl [192.16.196.188]) by hera.cwi.nl with ESMTP
	id q7FB7veT029020 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 13:07:57 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 13:07:57 +0200
From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Questions about SystemD and OpenRC
Message-ID: <20120815110757.GV10705@gentoo.org>
Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
References: <20120809183130.GA6795@linux1>
 <CADPrc82tAN0p9kbQUSySHFMH4500n_J4M80y2ROEkah=bpcSAQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120809195727.5d04ccff@googlemail.com>
 <CADPrc80c22XW2gfQ_QHgzRORQfDcTuer1iai9_kuE=cHrOAvZg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGfcS_kxg98UvRmXN1J2vyvatQ87xV6HiJgKYoEF3tuHWJOUpg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120814032416.GA8489@kroah.com>
 <CAGfcS_kkXF+JDu3Y1Fv+7JL+fiedx+UPyoRva-KCXZcMDbpCsQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADPrc81Ytn9+MuGtxsmzosct=gK==vP_Jw4ew262f_WYtOEZWQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGfcS_kBy1u6AjTiGn8vtrB8pqO3A966pzMxkHJGM6Z5JqJE_g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120815125832.39c72a82@pomiocik.lan>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9AazSAFPVKSPmRXK"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120815125832.39c72a82@pomiocik.lan>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (Darwin 9.8.0, VIM - Vi IMproved 7.3)
Organization: Gentoo Foundation, Inc.
X-Archives-Salt: 72837e18-89ef-4293-bb7e-287c908dd31a
X-Archives-Hash: afbcaabf6a98e334b869f9cad82ab387


--9AazSAFPVKSPmRXK
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 15-08-2012 12:58:32 +0200, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote:
> Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > 2.  Things like Prefix rely on the system not installing local copies
> > of libraries in the core system it needs to link to.  Careful use of
> > package.provided in profiles might address this.

Huh?  Not sure I understand this, but it suggests something which isn't
true for Prefix to me.

> We could also make virtuals not pull in anything on Prefix in those
> cases.

Things like virtual/os-headers already do so.


--=20
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level

--9AazSAFPVKSPmRXK
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (Darwin)

iEYEARECAAYFAlArgwwACgkQX3X2B8XHTomrawCeNvIEzQqDV7bF6touPBhYM/w+
CTEAnRubxsBd3/a22VQNzh8s0CdoU7Y7
=OmUR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--9AazSAFPVKSPmRXK--