From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49C5513800E for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 08:00:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 26F38E071D; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 07:59:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39CC4E06F7 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 07:59:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (87-205-57-138.adsl.inetia.pl [87.205.57.138]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 81E751B4005; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 07:59:20 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 09:59:50 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: williamh@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: virtual/libudev Message-ID: <20120810095950.5bfb0f5a@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <20120710192427.GA22787@linux1> References: <20120710171800.493a7c4c@pomiocik.lan> <20120710192427.GA22787@linux1> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.11; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; boundary="Sig_/_aLlPS7/bolwdpMH2afqA4e"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: d160b547-4c67-41ce-85e3-46ceb02196b9 X-Archives-Hash: ca052f84aba3eb9307ac56055be16e04 --Sig_/_aLlPS7/bolwdpMH2afqA4e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 14:24:27 -0500 William Hubbs wrote: > On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 05:18:00PM +0200, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > > Hello, all. > >=20 > > Since nowadays udev is bundled within systemd, we start having two > > libudev providers: >=3Dsys-apps/systemd-185 and sys-fs/udev. Making > > the long story short, I would like to introduce a virtual for > > libudev which would pull in either of those two. > >=20 > > There are three USE flags used in conditionals when depending on > > udev: > > - gudev - for glib wrapper on udev, > > - hwdb - to pull in hwids, > > - static-libs. > >=20 > > The former two were previously provided by 'extras' USE flag, > > and the third was unconditional. > >=20 > > I'm attaching an example virtual/libudev which does the job. Sadly, > > because of the 'extras' compatibility it's a big ugly conditional. >=20 > I'm going to ask here, because of the discussion on IRC, that you not > commit this yet. There are issues still we need to work out wrt > packaging systemd and udev. So, can I commit the virtual and finally start fixing people's systems or are we going to discuss this to the day when other options are no longer a possibility and virtual will be necessary? You seem still not to understand that upstream *does not care*. And either way, merging udev and systemd will result that two, four or six months from now users will need to manually re-adjust their @world to have the packages split again. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/_aLlPS7/bolwdpMH2afqA4e Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQEIAAYFAlAkv3cACgkQfXuS5UK5QB3pfAP/cecmT2gkyJVpruhYMl+f0GQT QYK3jBh/Nj0H40sXbz/jrK2X7oICIqMplvazXkRdhEn/Endzus2Tw2/Qt64t/RzV inIdALnWwSX7BcsfgdmA6CrByAirv+bKsVvxb+dgTPXo/Hj6d4u9Q/4RNxmsd7Fo nWF6ta/jQAe8uyp58AU= =xRhV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/_aLlPS7/bolwdpMH2afqA4e--