From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD78213800E for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 10:01:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BF58521C01A; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 10:01:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC272E05ED for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 10:00:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (87-205-57-138.adsl.inetia.pl [87.205.57.138]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6AAB81B400F; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 10:00:27 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 12:01:07 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: lu_zero@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Global Systemd USE Flag Message-ID: <20120809120107.6133556a@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <502380F4.5000603@gentoo.org> References: <20120808161551.425c8e62@pomiocik.lan> <20120808163359.305604e9@pomiocik.lan> <50227C5A.20006@gentoo.org> <20120808165330.5a0c8689@pomiocik.lan> <50237966.30901@gentoo.org> <20120809105733.7fa0dfa3@pomiocik.lan> <502380F4.5000603@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.11; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; boundary="Sig_/qwQC8_O91QGsXjS9dfa3r06"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 625007d8-62f7-452e-b80d-87062f4bd785 X-Archives-Hash: fbed727ed5b8dedcb00ca53be18f41e2 --Sig_/qwQC8_O91QGsXjS9dfa3r06 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 11:20:52 +0200 Luca Barbato wrote: > On 08/09/2012 10:57 AM, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > > No. I meant to have 'GNU' tools with 'GNU' stripped. Isn't that what > > the whole discussion is about? Changing names of tools just for > > someone's liking? >=20 > No, we are discussing about an upstream merging two unrelated projects > assuring users that nothing would change for them. >=20 > In a week they claimed that it was unsupported, then backpedaled, then > they changed its paths. >=20 > Forking udev hadn't been considered mostly just on that premise. So someone should just *finally* fork it, rather than talking about it all the time. And I believe that renaming executables won't undo the merge. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/qwQC8_O91QGsXjS9dfa3r06 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQEIAAYFAlAjimQACgkQfXuS5UK5QB0O9wP/ZLrE8DPxof5+LMVCvdVC2yBK KlLZrin9hdqaY8bhw4vb1vbqw8swgrFI4tRDSajnq2NVR5GDirg+FQN8AqVvx4aR 99x96XfYm9b9ky+C4lDLticCVEONC98+YyW0BPv4sqq0q+uaOQjd3TqXdga+28YV uq0svJOqgRiwz7D8svo= =B/72 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/qwQC8_O91QGsXjS9dfa3r06--