From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA40A13800E for ; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 15:14:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 494AEE0958; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 15:14:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D93CD21C014 for ; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 15:12:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (87-205-57-138.adsl.inetia.pl [87.205.57.138]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 56F5A641D4; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 15:12:46 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 17:13:26 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: rich0@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Global Systemd USE Flag Message-ID: <20120808171326.1de448bb@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: References: <20120808161551.425c8e62@pomiocik.lan> <20120808163359.305604e9@pomiocik.lan> <50227C5A.20006@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.11; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; boundary="Sig_/.XpqjDc_bRU_m+q1tdyJEgD"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: cb6d045e-3692-49ca-893b-c0abf13d0b93 X-Archives-Hash: 9a73ff68049b8dbac7971b3c9cac599d --Sig_/.XpqjDc_bRU_m+q1tdyJEgD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 8 Aug 2012 11:03:25 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote: > On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Patrick Lauer > wrote: > > can we *please* use the openrc useflag to have correct paths and > > binary names again? > > Just because upstream says we should be fedora doesn't mean we have > > to do it. >=20 > I think that having binaries going in different places based on a USE > flag is going to lead to a big mess - especially if we're talking > about system packages. >=20 > If we want to argue about where we put something by all means hash it > out or escalate to council. If we want to debate whether to install > compatibility symlinks I think that is also more reasonable. >=20 > However, I don't want the path to bash or glibc or whatever to depend > on whether a particular package maintainer believes in the /usr move > or even moreso whether some USE flag is set. Path to bash can't change because it will break most of scripts in the world. Path to libc can't change because it will break all of the executables in the world. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/.XpqjDc_bRU_m+q1tdyJEgD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQEIAAYFAlAighYACgkQfXuS5UK5QB2RIgP/RKwP6Mp9WS6Bx+1YlUYQtqnY OAr+vi7fRPMmPSLRxBpVC892xNrWG5Y1LTwtBO5sJcEJNnoyDnyJB4EcpSLHs+Xo qM13BMGWZOvguaY8fj3tX8ZAUaFErhyT1xIKZRSGJ6YDfUJLNUaDPeYjTzEvq1y0 cJAg76D7I3JpOGaN2X0= =gq5D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/.XpqjDc_bRU_m+q1tdyJEgD--