From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-53720-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 690C713800E
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 09:28:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 86E73E0828;
	Sat, 28 Jul 2012 09:27:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 457B8E081B
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 09:27:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from sera-17.lan (132-107.78-83.cust.bluewin.ch [83.78.107.132])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: sera)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A7AD81B40C6
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 09:27:08 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 11:27:03 +0200
From: Ralph Sennhauser <sera@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Fwd: Heads up for Qt5
Message-ID: <20120728112703.17b12322@sera-17.lan>
In-Reply-To: <CAB9SyzSP7mwoHpaAnLPgo4TJ46FrMyTYpoJGnAT6V4AbzQxfTA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAB9SyzSY0beKPpYE3fW93RP7TbBCoDvMOGDj8oa=pN_rEEkPmA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAB9SyzT1=s88TWjuW7w3Kap6xe_0VsANEFSJ0=JL72-R1vYysg@mail.gmail.com>
	<juvv3q$epp$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<CAB9SyzSxSd09L7h9O6F=wVMFAAT4x--vZAgPRTCY4_O6E2dUXA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120728094309.2152ef42@sera-17.lan>
	<CAB9SyzSP7mwoHpaAnLPgo4TJ46FrMyTYpoJGnAT6V4AbzQxfTA@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Gentoo Linux
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: a74e15d0-f9c3-473e-9c03-4b543f8b9d79
X-Archives-Hash: a91f54344b99d52dde4c2c3b4c3cfd8d

On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 15:54:07 +0800
Ben de Groot <yngwin@gentoo.org> wrote:

> We do not have (nor want to support) a qt useflag. We have opted
> for "qt4" and "qt5" useflags as the most straightforward and least
> confusing.

Indeed, the flag qt has almost disappeared from the tree. Good to know.