From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9518C13800E for ; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 15:51:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 50180E050C; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 15:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-f181.google.com (mail-qc0-f181.google.com [209.85.216.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4465FE04C7 for ; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 15:50:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qcpx40 with SMTP id x40so2029217qcp.40 for ; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 08:50:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=7zZfnaVDdRPdJTgEqyalh3+abX2twPzoSxtf823OcvI=; b=saobP++U6mGsND6zr6r/3q9KLVlZyzGnVUu4ZxwS409R+Zb7nUz8u2Wnys9vXSoMow 6EDOaiQlC+gulVxaU3yLgtjgtsgc7FKzi7qVLdJj1mkH+jmNz/ngdEvNnU9Ef4LCrD4q PbGJx9u5As5P/ey233cA3m8PK/4FhjwFRK+Kl7FC6yh4S1LFwhZ0O5UCwp44jMmjV06s 3MzBFOXFtYUgE6pQkF2ggaQeCaq/PqYf+qtzSJgn0hF5sXDOkRViRBxFKMeYzcuzolrU 3re4RKFJw8tLbFtzsvzjDhgyvaw6EXD13BCcFyxLfYFlVq16qLmqR4l/DWCnDCCTuf5+ a8JQ== Received: by 10.60.0.164 with SMTP id 4mr4225628oef.4.1343404207526; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 08:50:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-187-95-170.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.95.170]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id aa6sm1552187oec.0.2012.07.27.08.50.05 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 27 Jul 2012 08:50:06 -0700 (PDT) Sender: William Hubbs Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 27 Jul 2012 10:50:05 -0500 Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 10:50:05 -0500 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: virtual/libudev Message-ID: <20120727155005.GA3248@linux1> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20120710171800.493a7c4c@pomiocik.lan> <4FFC813B.7090501@gentoo.org> <20120711160946.2cb6fe64@pomiocik.lan> <4FFDC54A.7010505@gentoo.org> <20120711230404.3876a4e6@pomiocik.lan> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: 178acc44-b2db-4473-9835-301c2ce9d91b X-Archives-Hash: ccbfb4faff73ce39f2616da2a5a59f8f --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 09:49:04PM -0500, Canek Pel=E1ez Vald=E9s wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote: > [ snip ] > > 9) Otherwise, at very minimum, they're failing the "build udev pretty > > much the same as before" >=20 > ./configure > make > make install >=20 > You fail to see the matter from their POV. They don't care (that much) > about building, because the distributions they care about use binary > prebuilt packages. In that sense, "build udev pretty much the same as > before" is the holly trinity of "./configure; make; make install". > Otherwise the part about "package only what is necessary" has not that > much sense. >=20 > Which again leads to the "please, add a virtual/udev" so the people > using systemd don't need to built udev twice. Unless we add sys-apps/systemd to virtual/dev-manager. If we do that I don't see a need for virtual/udev. Also, I don't see how systemd users are building udev twice as it currently stands. William --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlASuK0ACgkQblQW9DDEZTgOZQCfbpnG9oCsk3SIKrQLn+4W89d2 mPUAn1QApXnC5+bRs/KCwe1/kXfdnriy =bawS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH--