From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SsJd8-0002Oy-MP for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 20:16:55 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F071921C00C; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 20:16:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-f195.google.com (mail-we0-f195.google.com [74.125.82.195]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19F91E0486 for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 20:16:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by weyx10 with SMTP id x10so599821wey.10 for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 13:16:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; bh=p3aRUYK1NNjPzFyFdsFgrsdjzgf/Jty9EeaXgNoha68=; b=ylC31933guJzDZo/au2bGgTFAOITZFcaGSy6yYAVPe5Flutar0cF2Dr0WdcCA/K3Ne 0wXCqt/apK6c2bLft2Ng+4cVRrzZDRASDnfNeCGi3pyBfNnTiFQNTvKzp18fV1I31G7f P40XKdQlCMRK7yUmr9Heqx1crCIN8QRijKEvvo565BLLPwfPIOr85bV52XQzhwcIYjWl h6gQuog2k/H0HIN6UoNw3dQy/HGgwsnsvQHGP8fPJ6Gc/WasnPFvx9UZ55/qEAgkyr5w CzziWs2nodhMxYovVbIkMZ2GUVOmRf014QNoH94ZPqL08pNN4bBcEZiqX1dIHq+r7voR Jjpw== Received: by 10.180.100.133 with SMTP id ey5mr17370713wib.4.1342815364305; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 13:16:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc13-broo7-2-0-cust130.14-2.cable.virginmedia.com. [82.9.16.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ck9sm18195446wib.2.2012.07.20.13.16.03 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 20 Jul 2012 13:16:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 21:15:32 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: l10n.eclass Message-ID: <20120720211532.53da559f@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <1342815058.9434.80.camel@rook> References: <20120719151422.1fb9883b@sera-17.lan> <50087884.90006@gentoo.org> <20120720075457.4cccea26@googlemail.com> <20120720180910.748470a0@googlemail.com> <1342806195.9434.24.camel@rook> <20120720185419.23244eb7@googlemail.com> <1342809439.9434.56.camel@rook> <20120720194134.61e917f2@googlemail.com> <1342811731.9434.70.camel@rook> <20120720201722.44884a38@googlemail.com> <1342813714.9434.77.camel@rook> <20120720210244.17a7c071@googlemail.com> <1342815058.9434.80.camel@rook> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/JwwqO2=pxcpgvDmN25KgnM7"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 3d58b39b-79e5-4f96-ba23-4354b954da5a X-Archives-Hash: 637519883d16c56f804da0c5de636c4b --Sig_/JwwqO2=pxcpgvDmN25KgnM7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 16:10:58 -0400 Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: > On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 21:02 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > Which is why it's policy that you check every dependent before > > making changes to a package. You *do* follow that policy, and not > > just assume that repoman passing means it's fine, right? >=20 > Excellent. So we are finally in agreement that one *already* needs to > check every dependent before making changes to a package - in other > words, that implementing my LINGUAS proposal would not change that > part of the required workflow for an ebuild maintainer. It would, though, because ebuilds exist in VDB and in overlays too. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/JwwqO2=pxcpgvDmN25KgnM7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlAJvGcACgkQ96zL6DUtXhHeGQCdHEyQt2/PL/gpCYu/NtZy9ZzD /kkAnjk0E6K8tNp5FqUtGknCZwaTJBYd =ufV+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/JwwqO2=pxcpgvDmN25KgnM7--