public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: l10n.eclass
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 21:02:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120720210244.17a7c071@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1342813714.9434.77.camel@rook>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1962 bytes --]

On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 15:48:34 -0400
Alexandre Rostovtsev <tetromino@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 20:17 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 15:15:31 -0400
> > Alexandre Rostovtsev <tetromino@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > > > That's sensitive to old versions ebuilds being removed from the
> > > > tree, so it's utterly unworkable.
> > > 
> > > I do not see why you think it's unworkable. Ebuilds already have
> > > dependencies that can be broken by removing an old version; if
> > > wombat depends on foo[bar], and you removed the only version of
> > > foo that had bar in IUSE, you broke wombat. Adding special
> > > LINGUAS handling would not change the fact that before deleting
> > > an ebuild, you need to verify that you did not render other
> > > ebuilds' dependencies unsatisfiable.
> > 
> > That's not how undefaulted use dependencies work. If wombat depends
> > upon foo[bar], it is an error if there is *any* version of foo
> > *ever* that doesn't have bar in IUSE_EFFECTIVE.
> 
> Very odd; AFAICT neither portage nor repoman treats that situation as
> an error. I am guessing that this is another case where paludis does
> things differently?

Paludis yells. Portage silently ignores the error and does something
unexpected. The spec is clear that it is an error, though.

> Be that as it may, even with paludis, the foo maintainer could easily
> break wombat if wombat depended on foo:bar, and the last ebuild
> matching foo:bar got removed; or on foo[bar,baz], and the only
> remaining versions of foo in the tree have REQUIRED_USE="^^ ( bar baz
> )"; or on foo[bar], when the only remaining versions of foo in the
> tree have bar disabled via profiles/base/package.use.mask.

Which is why it's policy that you check every dependent before making
changes to a package. You *do* follow that policy, and not just assume
that repoman passing means it's fine, right?

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-20 20:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-19  6:45 [gentoo-dev] RFC: l10n.eclass Ben de Groot
2012-07-19 13:14 ` Ralph Sennhauser
2012-07-19 15:37   ` Ben de Groot
2012-07-20  7:33     ` Ralph Sennhauser
2012-07-23 12:29       ` Ben de Groot
2012-07-23 15:22         ` Ralph Sennhauser
2012-07-19 16:15   ` Ciaran McCreesh
2012-07-19 21:13   ` Zac Medico
2012-07-19 22:34     ` Mike Gilbert
2012-07-20  6:54       ` Ciaran McCreesh
2012-07-20 16:39         ` Mike Gilbert
2012-07-20 17:09           ` Ciaran McCreesh
2012-07-20 17:29             ` Mike Gilbert
2012-07-20 17:35               ` Ciaran McCreesh
2012-07-20 17:43             ` Alexandre Rostovtsev
2012-07-20 17:46               ` Alexandre Rostovtsev
2012-07-20 17:54               ` Ciaran McCreesh
2012-07-20 18:37                 ` Alexandre Rostovtsev
2012-07-20 18:41                   ` Ciaran McCreesh
2012-07-20 19:15                     ` Alexandre Rostovtsev
2012-07-20 19:17                       ` Ciaran McCreesh
2012-07-20 19:48                         ` Alexandre Rostovtsev
2012-07-20 20:02                           ` Ciaran McCreesh [this message]
2012-07-20 20:10                             ` Alexandre Rostovtsev
2012-07-20 20:15                               ` Ciaran McCreesh
2012-07-20 20:11                           ` Ian Stakenvicius
2012-07-20 19:05                 ` Ian Stakenvicius
2012-07-20 19:13                   ` Ciaran McCreesh
2012-07-20 20:08                     ` Ian Stakenvicius
2012-07-20 17:44           ` Michał Górny
2012-07-20 18:03             ` Alexandre Rostovtsev
2012-07-20 17:55         ` Mike Gilbert
2012-07-20 18:03           ` Ciaran McCreesh
2012-07-20 18:09             ` Mike Gilbert
2012-07-20 18:15               ` Ciaran McCreesh
2012-07-19 22:44 ` Mike Gilbert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120720210244.17a7c071@googlemail.com \
    --to=ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox