From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Spsoj-0006Kz-Db for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 03:14:49 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AC66DE03E4; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 03:14:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-f181.google.com (mail-ob0-f181.google.com [209.85.214.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53324E0484 for ; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 03:13:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbup19 with SMTP id up19so6056763obb.40 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 20:13:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=yzOWRbxPQYE1GR5DgRt/9abSSfJnw2QBI0Qd70avogA=; b=kxSODf0kkQADeAXl2O21oMkPe0AYJ6S8kJ9Yn56LUfncox1s1eUGG/Gnfko51iilO6 lVJEKPqQJPBw55pNhCulE4tClXSt8OW/SXBF2NPnXuyUJ8FHnuPdtpsuR57tDqo5pyWy f39A5jkbEhKi27qPC2JbhzH2aYybePQ4UoQ+U77io5gn6kk+pA6G4nROlgU8t6J2dBKv ZqZ7LfIvwPPY6jkIpTOX+rjJF3OJazMb0+RjEvfjQcw3wAKv88xfcE7xeWBZ8V3uVlal dvZg6NR41glkUSnoHTkk//KsLYdrjb61H0EY4ZAOC8QCCkTQKlQraLDv3TtGNnSvzwQD eZog== Received: by 10.182.212.70 with SMTP id ni6mr4780310obc.44.1342235609564; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 20:13:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-187-77-158.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.77.158]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l10sm5846941oeb.13.2012.07.13.20.13.27 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 13 Jul 2012 20:13:29 -0700 (PDT) Sender: William Hubbs Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 13 Jul 2012 22:13:27 -0500 Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 22:13:27 -0500 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: udev <-> mdev Message-ID: <20120714031327.GA8799@linux1> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20120712034036.GA2439@waltdnes.org> <4FFED31D.9010505@gentoo.org> <20120712200741.GB3723@waltdnes.org> <20120712222931.GA3044@linux1> <20120713200449.GA6292@waltdnes.org> <50008143.3050708@gentoo.org> <20120714001343.GA6879@waltdnes.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5vNYLRcllDrimb99" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120714001343.GA6879@waltdnes.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: d17a954d-2604-4a4c-bdde-d7f9ade68e59 X-Archives-Hash: 9c2c1205dcfdb9bd7cafdc76be609ff8 --5vNYLRcllDrimb99 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 08:13:43PM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote: > On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 01:49:32AM +0300, Maxim Kammerer wrote > > On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Richard Yao wrote: > > > mdev would need to switch to the netlink hotplug interface. > >=20 > > I think that's quite unlikely, since mdev is not a daemon. Perhaps by > > the time /proc/sys/kernel/hotplug is gone, mdev advocates will have > > settled on some early udev fork. [1] >=20 > Do you realize this would effectively kill linux in the embedded > device area? Udev, even without the systemd code, is simply to large > for embedded devices. What about using devtmpfs alone? William --5vNYLRcllDrimb99 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEUEARECAAYFAlAA49cACgkQblQW9DDEZTjCAwCXWPKGSOTM153iZHASDODLz6JZ qwCdFOPp/3aoJ+JP3u4+9dvpmhTMyag= =PG1r -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5vNYLRcllDrimb99--