From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SpKHw-0006ib-03 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:22:40 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F2128E068E; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:22:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 971CBE0665 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:20:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (178-37-176-127.adsl.inetia.pl [178.37.176.127]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 114371B400B; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:20:46 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 16:20:58 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: axs@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: udev-rules.eclass Message-ID: <20120712162058.6fe67022@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <4FFED49D.6020704@gentoo.org> References: <20120711191142.GA26844@linux1> <4FFDE8C6.40006@flameeyes.eu> <20120711234230.GA27226@linux1> <4FFED49D.6020704@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; boundary="Sig_/_HwVWWHu+ysBpBpUr.lac0p"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: a2c77830-1bf7-4b1b-8faf-22f4147d23b6 X-Archives-Hash: c61b8b084bb9854b7efc0c45b50c0e7a --Sig_/_HwVWWHu+ysBpBpUr.lac0p Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 09:43:57 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 >=20 > On 12/07/12 01:01 AM, Ben de Groot wrote: > > On 12 July 2012 07:42, William Hubbs wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:57:42PM +0200, Diego Elio Petten=C3=B2 > >> wrote: > >>> Il 11/07/2012 21:11, William Hubbs ha scritto: > >>>> I am about to release udev-186-r1, which will move everything > >>>> currently in /lib/udev to /usr/lib/udev. > >>>=20 > >>> Unless you're going to establish a symlink, please keep it > >>> under p.mask until everything is using some common code =E2=80=94 > >>> otherwise things _will_ break. > >>=20 > >> Since multiple packages put things in /lib/udev, I'm not sure it > >> is possible to establish a symlink from /lib/udev to > >> /usr/lib/udev if that's what you mean; I'll look into it though. > >=20 > > Couldn't you, on udev upgrade, move everything in /lib/udev to=20 > > /usr/lib/udev, and then make the symlink? Seems fairly simple to > > me, but maybe I'm overlooking something? > >=20 >=20 > A symlink isn't a good idea as, iirc, the new udev still -reads- from > both /usr/lib/udev and /lib/udev .. Does it? I wasn't able to reproduce and wanted to start convincing Kay to let it do that... --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/_HwVWWHu+ysBpBpUr.lac0p Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQEIAAYFAk/+3UoACgkQfXuS5UK5QB2i4QP9EvlZDYJu0Y1E0GLg022gBNuT wNbgQYjJf9wQFTFdFFJeVQsnDXm1ECWyO9YW8B9akmW+bSlECM3I7G4jNmwkFcWD /HRMGg9taHissi0a5irJ/dNNfYN5aXtA7NTyEEnLBHO45eezfnUMfXlBDOXMqbdC 6/mmf3uFtBLnk1GcUk0= =Af9X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/_HwVWWHu+ysBpBpUr.lac0p--