From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Sp6ZB-0005Ou-9F for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 23:43:33 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7933EE07A1; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 23:43:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-f181.google.com (mail-ob0-f181.google.com [209.85.214.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1727E0796 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 23:42:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbup19 with SMTP id up19so2430635obb.40 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 16:42:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=DnPqxdPTnCXkkpBJX9FvDv00+kqSGG6NSbybHWP9Aao=; b=O1Csbd+kEbaSikfsj56EEpUNYLoJaPWN3utFRfAWz7oq8FqtGuut4Fy3pc7UqtGSIR hCDA2zQXx7SujeFyRDm4lgxdvRiQDG0dLKwVcOB1QzQJF76+eO+LMdIxgmv4pUPFTks2 RmaBhzB9580/EsolYmCK3Z65cSCCe4HIOPcXb9yNdRHqPmNAyj5XAiil3uh71n2/fw6H PUmisRz41qcXE5lthNsT8V78Db87/Gd+eBzHwbtDzMQuVIlC4wXIuBeblOqexwCRq3br cQByaAYbVO6gD9TBGzzo7t+WMw/7WIgmGm+rwqVA6GrIm0nTdXg1UFfYwtDFTKxTIZPo So/g== Received: by 10.182.146.84 with SMTP id ta20mr5371820obb.19.1342050152240; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 16:42:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-187-77-158.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.77.158]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c6sm2643821obl.22.2012.07.11.16.42.30 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 11 Jul 2012 16:42:31 -0700 (PDT) Sender: William Hubbs Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 11 Jul 2012 18:42:30 -0500 Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 18:42:30 -0500 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: flameeyes@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: udev-rules.eclass Message-ID: <20120711234230.GA27226@linux1> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, flameeyes@gentoo.org References: <20120711191142.GA26844@linux1> <4FFDE8C6.40006@flameeyes.eu> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FFDE8C6.40006@flameeyes.eu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: 136b4d1c-658c-40f1-bf76-31764b669c30 X-Archives-Hash: 6371f95723c052d1653ab1bd6f04b68b --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:57:42PM +0200, Diego Elio Petten=C3=B2 wrote: > Il 11/07/2012 21:11, William Hubbs ha scritto: > > I am about to release udev-186-r1, which will move everything currently > > in /lib/udev to /usr/lib/udev. >=20 > Unless you're going to establish a symlink, please keep it under p.mask > until everything is using some common code =E2=80=94 otherwise things _wi= ll_ break. Since multiple packages put things in /lib/udev, I'm not sure it is possible to establish a symlink from /lib/udev to /usr/lib/udev if that's what you mean; I'll look into it though. My concern about p.mask is things tend to die there. How will we know for sure when there will not be any breakages without putting it in ~arch to see what breaks? William --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk/+D2YACgkQblQW9DDEZTiE7ACfeGGRWja3pLKA09gWx7DlLujH fFYAn1636dgdMRI0t5jcky5yKIx5XZEd =KGtb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf--