From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Sp3x8-0007zc-DD for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 20:56:06 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D94CCE07B3; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 20:55:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-f181.google.com (mail-ob0-f181.google.com [209.85.214.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 329ECE079E for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 20:55:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbup19 with SMTP id up19so2225843obb.40 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 13:55:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=TZoSIgqKWuk2eXdqKJmXnkNohwLs5rXi+KtDEdzmBps=; b=TaiwnJgI6biF4g9J4EzYC3mcA7zuKXMzNP82ZRcW3qDVPfgxReAe9owjuik276vLMr bNNS+BGGjCufvBzySyeMEi0K+PrXkp/nJM07bRapc0eCH6gu5xcQQ2a3OSPVCoXDyFfR cUyyng7NbkcvwK6iJ9dFAA/RMCXarCL8WZ+wzFz30EItFCnx9J7rXHoYdUhYIVGVnq2d Cz3PrnK3mkh/wmAcHcRBP0xBP71tkN/X+sPjGIDK6jK1DI1bms1UPbImPSgexAi+mqiM FOM+22d/D8KTezvEFu0cR6uORUMVIz+5ZCUW1/Ae59Or/+7ZHI9LHeuNUFhOW8NnIwh2 Um4A== Received: by 10.182.98.108 with SMTP id eh12mr46196016obb.6.1342040101527; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 13:55:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-187-77-158.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.77.158]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i5sm1725794oei.4.2012.07.11.13.54.59 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 11 Jul 2012 13:55:00 -0700 (PDT) Sender: William Hubbs Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 11 Jul 2012 15:54:59 -0500 Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 15:54:59 -0500 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: virtual/libudev Message-ID: <20120711205459.GA27010@linux1> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20120710171800.493a7c4c@pomiocik.lan> <4FFC813B.7090501@gentoo.org> <20120711160946.2cb6fe64@pomiocik.lan> <4FFDC54A.7010505@gentoo.org> <20120711195423.GA26913@linux1> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ibTvN161/egqYuK8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: f3b977aa-0cbe-41ce-a362-2a790e08870c X-Archives-Hash: 8169a559a0268738ba3c5390a1f87688 --ibTvN161/egqYuK8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 04:33:44PM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 3:54 PM, William Hubbs wrot= e: > > Thinking on this, I agree with Mike here, and to make it easier for > > maintainers so they don't have to change their dependencies, it should > > be a udev ebuild with a systemd use flag. >=20 > An alternative to the funky udev[systemd] solution would be to replace > the entire udev ebuild with RDEPEND=3D"sys-apps/systemd", and implement > the requisite logic in the systemd ebuild. This would effectively make > udev a virtual package without the need to modify any other packages. You would still have funkey logic in the systemd ebuild then, because you would have to have a use flag, maybe "udev-standalone" which would make it only install udev, and you would still have to deal with use flags that don't make sense without systemd being installed. William --ibTvN161/egqYuK8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk/96CMACgkQblQW9DDEZThbRQCcC7wwX2O2DHoP/NoTXOGkxJm1 7XwAn0H5v4R/7EwOvv/WDsVMV+YCzCwj =feFN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ibTvN161/egqYuK8--