From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SosMj-0006v3-8e for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 08:33:45 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 29D0EE0761; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 08:33:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CF46E02FB for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 08:32:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (178-37-171-8.adsl.inetia.pl [178.37.171.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F34231B4035; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 08:32:56 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:33:06 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: 1i5t5.duncan@cox.net Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: virtual/libudev Message-ID: <20120711103306.1d687c18@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: References: <20120710171800.493a7c4c@pomiocik.lan> <4FFC813B.7090501@gentoo.org> <20120711091510.52b44e08@pomiocik.lan> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; boundary="Sig_/iVl=4pC1Aug6pdPBbae_SHY"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 5d249410-77f2-45fb-8072-3e1a5007e877 X-Archives-Hash: 0c59f94b28b19a2d6a8fa85145898071 --Sig_/iVl=4pC1Aug6pdPBbae_SHY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 08:27:48 +0000 (UTC) Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote: > Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny posted on Wed, 11 Jul 2012 09:15:10 +0200 as excer= pted: >=20 > > On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:51:50 +0800 Ben de Groot > > wrote: >=20 > >> When upstream moved the udev sources to the systemd repo, they > >> promised that udev would continue to be able to be used separately > >> from systemd. We should hold them to that promise. > >>=20 > >> If they break their promise (as it seems they are bent on doing), > >> then we should go ahead with the fork as discussed earlier. I'm > >> sure other distros such as Debian and Slackware would be happy to > >> join us in that effort. > >=20 > > If we fork, then I would expect systemd to actually require its own > > udev which means that systemd would need to build it anyway. What's > > the point? >=20 >=20 > Being able to choose not to run systemd at all? If there's no need > to build systemd, than what it requires is irrelevant. Who forces you to do otherwise? I really don't see what this thread is all about. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/iVl=4pC1Aug6pdPBbae_SHY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQEIAAYFAk/9OkMACgkQfXuS5UK5QB1DegP6AplzIW2gHXEBxf6rtjDO7QAA M+L27DHuoVFt7BuIZ3sEdvKDMRDw0LJEWpBskKs+r9VJRILvzSQ8GMoaJCE2JOuc N3SDeObVt8YmqnBVH5Rs6Ei7dvPmxhbSc0VKarRZE5uMf5p3QCJVmubfivPeXKyU Zx9sA9IP8FDmJq7rSEw= =wN4f -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/iVl=4pC1Aug6pdPBbae_SHY--