From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SoeiT-0005dp-Kf for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 17:59:17 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D4AA6E0C27; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 17:58:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC605E09D7 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 17:57:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (178-37-171-8.adsl.inetia.pl [178.37.171.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2B4991B4017; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 17:57:44 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 19:57:50 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: aballier@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: virtual/libudev Message-ID: <20120710195750.366ab5c8@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <20120710125431.0066b204@gentoo.org> References: <20120710171800.493a7c4c@pomiocik.lan> <20120710125431.0066b204@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; boundary="Sig_/EwcfY1+S_5fLQdO5eS=V.m2"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 46c0b834-cc55-46c9-b6ff-c3733dd352b9 X-Archives-Hash: 860d3369f5f9379b377071aea3f6f54c --Sig_/EwcfY1+S_5fLQdO5eS=V.m2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:54:31 -0400 Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 17:18:00 +0200 > Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: >=20 > > The former two were previously provided by 'extras' USE flag, > > and the third was unconditional. >=20 > since udev-171 seems to be going stable, why not simply drop the > 'extras' compatibility ? > then you could just use 'gudev?' usedeps it seems I heard that people are still bound to old udev versions because of kernel requirements introduced by newer ones. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/EwcfY1+S_5fLQdO5eS=V.m2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQEIAAYFAk/8bR4ACgkQfXuS5UK5QB2P5gQArHz/Fo2thq2yvRkAiccQd2mV KWAfbLB9Sg99afqxuwLNCOwIyhHLHUCUsGzEPleYfEyl9uEipBSdphDhTUOpZTMh FGEwpN44rrOnIzUqxb2wUf6vGgczbz3ASXeaM8dZoVlffgkgyxabeekKS7axUBYm Tus8dvM1620eggP1+9w= =2tUc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/EwcfY1+S_5fLQdO5eS=V.m2--