From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Soeyc-0001B7-Vi for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 18:15:59 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 43958E0A87; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 18:15:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-f181.google.com (mail-ob0-f181.google.com [209.85.214.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 032BDE0A70 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 18:15:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbup19 with SMTP id up19so302239obb.40 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 11:15:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=1WylTNHe6zjgxScv+301yzYrB+fL+Ji4AX9WQVL19gc=; b=mIBCNSoP35YPf6zDwMSaEcNfShD2h/fMgiX/n1UKlnFZKSzrIitPA6nt6EaFWrArfu AERqz4UDOwCIKY4jNbNsI0Li0weVNCEo/kuylxAk+3/TGC01eix8KZWva7RYMfTYp/ko ztjJ/VeF5izP9zQAG0VIGiGTBzuckvU1xTZCjncug0doR6i3HLtaqL6IHkPufUg3WDVF M2vdW1j64WIUks2533wthTMKkDKrSXNPvY+8l61k9Dl/WqRgcEbmnKdfAaAKEo7roWcX YFQ+O6Mnifs1nkxsZV3gxECxxptMhWNly7zi1Vj1AwnvflJRbCfSYO1a8Vgl9bhomx7H MZDg== Received: by 10.182.39.39 with SMTP id m7mr41975076obk.20.1341944104159; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 11:15:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-187-77-158.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.77.158]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id vs8sm33384016obb.14.2012.07.10.11.15.02 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 10 Jul 2012 11:15:03 -0700 (PDT) Sender: William Hubbs Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 10 Jul 2012 13:15:02 -0500 Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 13:15:02 -0500 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: virtual/libudev Message-ID: <20120710181502.GA22644@linux1> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20120710171800.493a7c4c@pomiocik.lan> <20120710125431.0066b204@gentoo.org> <20120710195750.366ab5c8@pomiocik.lan> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120710195750.366ab5c8@pomiocik.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: b9223f95-d4d7-4dc7-8685-59c219520a80 X-Archives-Hash: 9d570e0b6deeaba9246ded410e51f16d --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 07:57:50PM +0200, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:54:31 -0400 > Alexis Ballier wrote: >=20 > > On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 17:18:00 +0200 > > Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > >=20 > > > The former two were previously provided by 'extras' USE flag, > > > and the third was unconditional. > >=20 > > since udev-171 seems to be going stable, why not simply drop the > > 'extras' compatibility ? > > then you could just use 'gudev?' usedeps it seems >=20 > I heard that people are still bound to old udev versions because of > kernel requirements introduced by newer ones. The eventual plan is to kill off the extras use flag in favor of the others. It is only there to allow packages that depended on udev[extras] to be moved to depend on the correct use flag, so I think we should be able to kill it at some point. I just haven't looked into doing that. William --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk/8cSYACgkQblQW9DDEZTiy1QCeNpWPQiio8VTWu50oFf3f3eJc 7q0AnjQpSra84gkJTBkS6WOyw3abm+bq =XwB3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu--