From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SkTko-0002oJ-Ng for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 05:28:26 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 89EF9E07B5; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 05:28:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D9B6E07AD for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 05:27:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9540E1B40AF for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 05:27:29 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] My wishlist for EAPI 5 Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 01:27:32 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.4.0; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <4FE231BA.6020404@gentoo.org> <20120621080039.0724cf8d@googlemail.com> <1340280687.5028.6.camel@homer> In-Reply-To: <1340280687.5028.6.camel@homer> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1961697.mHyackxLVN"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201206290127.33246.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 6653252e-dafb-4873-9132-bfbbab15e811 X-Archives-Hash: 890087c897c0e0a41e9e909b4c97ab02 --nextPart1961697.mHyackxLVN Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thursday 21 June 2012 08:11:27 Homer Parker wrote: > On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 08:00 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > In case you're not aware, the first time Gentoo did multilib, it was > > done as a series of random changes to Portage that no-one really > > thought through or understood. As you can see, that didn't work... >=20 > No, but paved the way for other distros as they had nothing even close. > I'm sure you remember back then. Don't be an ass. many distros still don't. ever try Debian on ppc64 ? :) =2Dmike --nextPart1961697.mHyackxLVN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJP7TzFAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBVfoQAKY/KsdnnOsjZ3wtX6OgxwiY g9VXa4mXvBzSEjomLTD1af5VNnlR+tq8f0pFNcU7F98eKgg6HPW7LSmtPk+EbtuV ddsEInsJqnBGxAfXLbYWzLLoJL6wiclBGDJDpqchDpIlFX5WAckDquCVyM7uMeM5 mNeBwYLcj2ER+xZMzJKVd98ZPiDGq9t271pWBYs5+Fo0Rj3M88RAvnxLEdZHUMOd RPFGxpK224TYOzEGjdfBmNPJa1Neej4lbdvmIPp5uwLmJKYLCoJQX2okytfe439N ihfIXkBI8W94Bi9QZLWZXoC09J2UkwiJzGspnujn2Zx8kczNU3SXW8btAusM0KMr FYiIUnnTdygX1ekC9SbR82AcWUeUh4xUxo/M0KGRis43Dle0Y2UzOQPO4JA4MuMI pbSHHbPT3SSzRFuEh7SNxOHf8ie/LfdCEuHeyI5LVrCxgf2iP0qcoXCzOk/+nTXv XIFtAK+h67jNcGqt4Ui3h4SWuG2kAaWUoREAB0ipdVQQ7lCXyeyNqrXMc2ZthrzV ZOpllna4jfLS9JT1dVXXkQ4eZZRjIJASgQxfoemldnBh5Ht7ambiHnH0OjShw8z7 Zxfl9E1g1/n5GQDYVigKigq2TdktkYt1e/ks6dYEfeogQtelL337eta6gqhuLF9v fEuyMHMut4LqHh9deNqr =aqYL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1961697.mHyackxLVN--