On Tuesday 26 June 2012 00:04:35 Duncan wrote:
> Mike Gilbert posted on Mon, 25 Jun 2012 23:13:09 -0400 as excerpted:
> > Profiles do not set a "default bootloader" so I have no idea what you
> > are talking about.
> 
> I could have sworn there was a virtual/bootloader or some such, that was
> a part of @system and that thus would have likely had a default in the
> profiles packages file, but either there was but it's long gone, or I'm
> mis-remembering entirely.

long gone when we threw out old style virtuals
-mike