From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SiUWd-0000aZ-C9 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 17:53:35 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 66D79E0D10; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 17:53:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97252E0D05 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 17:52:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (77-255-3-88.adsl.inetia.pl [77.255.3.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B53EF1B405A; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 17:52:41 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 19:54:13 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: PROPERTIES=funky-slots Message-ID: <20120623195413.37fd6507@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <20120623184546.56f49e58@googlemail.com> References: <20120623142143.631d7ebf@googlemail.com> <4FE5EB23.5040600@gentoo.org> <20120623171704.4f24cba6@googlemail.com> <4FE5F31E.80608@gentoo.org> <20120623175324.038ca62e@googlemail.com> <1340472237.5979.75.camel@belkin4> <20120623183053.6d432605@googlemail.com> <1340473390.5979.76.camel@belkin4> <20120623184546.56f49e58@googlemail.com> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; boundary="Sig_/Rbl=lH3QO9/TKQdEj2.2VTX"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 488e9c9e-b688-4685-b2b6-f282720d4052 X-Archives-Hash: ba137dee3adeb3efbd6bc6c7376ac554 --Sig_/Rbl=lH3QO9/TKQdEj2.2VTX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 18:45:46 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 19:43:10 +0200 > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > > It treats -r300 as being newer than -r200, and so will treat "the > > > gtk3 version" or "the jruby version" as being newer versions of > > > "the gtk2 version" or "the ruby 1.8 version", just as it tries to > > > bring in a newer GCC and so on. > >=20 > > And what problems is that causing for you? >=20 > The problem is that there's no way of knowing that -r300 is not "a > newer version" than -r200 It is a newer version. That's why it has a newer revision. > and that the jruby implementation is not "a > newer version" than the ruby 1.8 implementation. And that's another thing which is ugly and should be replaced by something sane rather than worked around. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/Rbl=lH3QO9/TKQdEj2.2VTX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQEIAAYFAk/mAsYACgkQfXuS5UK5QB1OtwP+Iu0B/9PHaEux6+eB5iS53FfU IZS6jkiqrgQIilks6+H+/jKnN/aQ5126r6Gow0+gaAL6PVzbcx5N6mwftHIDtFAX yNZ1ro1C/m2AAoSX5SAr99W9KOi89Z/crVYM7j7cF9MT/AsKsO30rXCI82RSaR6b Vsz6aPnptIeW+/VNDMM= =Wc/r -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/Rbl=lH3QO9/TKQdEj2.2VTX--