From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SiULV-0006qb-Bn for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 17:42:05 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DFBB021C0C4; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 17:41:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com (mail-wi0-f175.google.com [209.85.212.175]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E32521C0BB for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 17:40:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhn6 with SMTP id hn6so1347008wib.10 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 10:40:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; bh=mn9J/1NtrNxbRfZc0qwIsqVNjPvxCid5Z4bLSyb4hhI=; b=u4Vz+6QL4Kk9w/IzjQd/egDtIviHR4CFkhf4hvEyqNkLwgAvWJSwvlsiE8zNnKhZey m/qoBBsW5oRY9LJuAT32HPU1BhWdgN81I8nMe1USAxvAQfcm2lvJvOMlX9wV2czXoIhQ WTIoV/niFb+5iNHkWolgjXmNNm7zAzpRqlOSCE8yZPdyjgEc6Qs6uQjJE4cmOeQ8Uos7 PjfnJRAh/Bavu4m6zm4tJHawRT222UPzoCbtaqofc8ZLEpCG6GLGmDfXb7vne2xrt/nx tmriDf2jL/GyzWoouWOJFYbIJQAbtHPmkXuOaVU4u1/uhXORPLF40uCBQsGQuKTUcW/A LgXw== Received: by 10.180.24.193 with SMTP id w1mr13314376wif.5.1340473250383; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 10:40:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc13-broo7-2-0-cust130.14-2.cable.virginmedia.com. [82.9.16.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z8sm12161567wiy.1.2012.06.23.10.40.49 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 23 Jun 2012 10:40:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 18:36:56 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: PROPERTIES=funky-slots Message-ID: <20120623183656.59a92746@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20120623142143.631d7ebf@googlemail.com> <4FE5EB23.5040600@gentoo.org> <20120623171704.4f24cba6@googlemail.com> <20120623182444.5413a888@googlemail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/ttgIv8vV1d6HS1cDTryKClu"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 3e977450-db84-41e6-9dcf-4a4ba75c969b X-Archives-Hash: d10b9c5014aa840fd3d5b74f9d15a61b --Sig_/ttgIv8vV1d6HS1cDTryKClu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 10:35:36 -0700 Alec Warner wrote: > I don't think portage has the behavior that paludis does, so most > users are not likely to experience this particular problem. You know > as well as I that the marking isn't necessarily trivial. But this time it is trivial. That's the point. > It could be that instead of Gentoo tagging a bunch of ebuilds, you > just change your resolver heuristic a bit. The resolver heuristic is correct, except in the cases where people are doing utterly weird things with revisions and slots. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/ttgIv8vV1d6HS1cDTryKClu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk/l/r4ACgkQ96zL6DUtXhGw/wCfZAtaY02yHIaGt84q7IfKB+av 2ToAn1BEMkqxScZ1oEfmL5+/KR9Y1xX8 =a1al -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/ttgIv8vV1d6HS1cDTryKClu--