From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ShdCU-0004r5-VJ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 08:57:15 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BE07BE08FC; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 08:57:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com (mail-wi0-f169.google.com [209.85.212.169]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 697EBE08BA for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 08:56:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhn14 with SMTP id hn14so4283731wib.4 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 01:56:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; bh=73uNWuDHf9cakizMBTOdUZtLTw8dcknfWjonGYEgGjo=; b=M52yVxFEMILQ8gfWicN3gxBNKm91SfbdgKWNv+azq6/w1Lfj+q701GfFNvpB9icPKa XbHGNT0c/DNqVAzm18hwyvcIWl41iFpcpDnpuZPVppIJVQAiSQ45l7dy8BkdMNqcdh2f 2GfmFWGMSuERRpJpB/iAUksnqbp4qmsUPaUeoudmFa4KKl+aflBGes0TvAJiZtYjIdiI ZZfpgyAAiv8hJuezVrCKbAhaca68qGSqeH0fwyCVZXl57jCVdWDSb4TshXJYOxweH77+ HAEZqsp6It+dx2Y7RgJGsfUNsPejXX3ON/L+dDH+ZKGytAPfLrTkuKqjJGMd5qw4uMR3 u1aw== Received: by 10.216.142.200 with SMTP id i50mr15668386wej.47.1340268977534; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 01:56:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from snowbell (switch57.dcs.gla.ac.uk. [130.209.241.107]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z8sm86416164wiy.1.2012.06.21.01.56.16 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 21 Jun 2012 01:56:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 09:56:15 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [pre-GLEP] Optional runtime dependencies via runtime-switchable USE flags Message-ID: <20120621095615.0a60e437@snowbell> In-Reply-To: <20120621105419.32f7e550@pomiocik.lan> References: <20120617223159.4e565741@pomiocik.lan> <4FE0AE7E.6030306@gentoo.org> <1340204734.9532.15.camel@cyclops.marienz.net> <4FE200EF.1020508@gentoo.org> <20120620190745.7b4af0e2@pomiocik.lan> <4FE20445.9050902@gentoo.org> <20120620182433.5ae1d6d4@googlemail.com> <20120621092949.5cb3cb17@pomiocik.lan> <20120621083024.77499b7b@googlemail.com> <20120621094236.555728b4@pomiocik.lan> <20120621084123.5058e072@googlemail.com> <20120621105419.32f7e550@pomiocik.lan> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.24.4; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/SqQ4u7amk.PV=ZnP/vgZzRf"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: e276f0d2-37e5-4aa8-afa9-17d0e5796099 X-Archives-Hash: 1389655b1beb6e34722062eb9e1fe408 --Sig_/SqQ4u7amk.PV=ZnP/vgZzRf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 10:54:19 +0200 Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > > And since when was "Implemented in Portage" a requirement for an > > EAPI feature? >=20 > Remember EAPI4 and features which had reference implementation not > in portage? Actually, yes, since that was "most of them". Nearly all of them got implemented quickly. Our policy on this has always been "ask Zac whether he thinks they're reasonably quick to implement". But you know this, so kindly keep your disruption to places where you're right. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/SqQ4u7amk.PV=ZnP/vgZzRf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk/i4a8ACgkQ96zL6DUtXhFrVQCdH/rZ6cvpMIUSM9JN29BElgwJ ioAAoMRRR1xGAQaEn+KmtKjBg1kmaq65 =gCuL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/SqQ4u7amk.PV=ZnP/vgZzRf--