From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ses1n-0003ut-7e for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 18:10:47 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D7617E057F; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 18:10:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from amun.cheops.ods.org (unknown [83.161.135.166]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C2FFE0458 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 18:09:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nut.cheops.ods.org ([2001:888:1022:0:ca2a:14ff:fe35:7a00] helo=gentoo.org) by amun.cheops.ods.org with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Ses0a-0005Zd-Hp for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 20:09:35 +0200 Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 20:09:31 +0200 From: Fabian Groffen To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: enewuser should force updates to shell and home Message-ID: <20120613180931.GU20778@gentoo.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <4FD8B910.3090606@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MEatx1zidE5asLAI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FD8B910.3090606@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (Darwin 11.4.0, VIM - Vi IMproved 7.3) Organization: Gentoo Foundation, Inc. X-Content-Scanned: by amun.cheops.ods.org (Exim Exiscan) using SpamAssassin and ClamAV X-Archives-Salt: 17a46156-2bf1-4bb6-828a-75eb9507cd41 X-Archives-Hash: 156c554aa8eb0cc573ee15b41c71be7f --MEatx1zidE5asLAI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 13-06-2012 12:00:16 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > Hey all - I'd like to propose that enewuser forces updates to a user's > home dir and shell whenever it is called, so that if this changes with > new versions of an ebuild it is dealt with automatically rather than > having to modify them in pkg_postinst/pkg_setup directly. What if some admin purposely changed home or shell for a system account? Would be quite annoying if every update would reset that, wouldn't it? --=20 Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level --MEatx1zidE5asLAI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAk/Y11sACgkQX3X2B8XHTon8AgCgok8L0+1HAD5f+bfK2mrTvEIn 7YQAn33EFEIcQ66Nu9EFm9L1FtlaLAjb =6LIJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MEatx1zidE5asLAI--