From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ScLuL-0006TB-14 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 19:28:41 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B66F2E0853; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 19:28:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com (mail-we0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52B19E083B for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 19:27:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by werj55 with SMTP id j55so5216904wer.40 for ; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 12:27:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; bh=kd9VRR1FSnuNmlJatIIjmZ+cSoA9KMV13x11SxVY66M=; b=nyiAlibFwIzQuKPH7vnglq7nH0d4cU2N5b5KXrvUdWxu8+PgmuaGzsQs1Mbx1xcj2r r8EzSm47UEckUYE6wwBYpUq4TSCVRoy8+Z3Ackia2hcm9jThSTV0Q1uOZuRYrnOEXcCv Gwx38tUrNY0qz8tl5ajPOn7fsHm0ugB6s2DDyrNRsdrvlGwUJQIn9tC1XUDfxcJx0vcD JnJfgKcFm7W7XwvNGirr+sPga/pIXgoEPycxebIApmoKyn4y8AQDoS4MxnlPXCOTaarY K0LLilGxpRLJgNl8I3fiJy9qgCHFmoK0Qwc4TmjO/oWrLV0Gy85hmDVPdaF0Z1jHqC6H Q0ZQ== Received: by 10.216.145.97 with SMTP id o75mr18129837wej.7.1339010819702; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 12:26:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc13-broo7-2-0-cust130.14-2.cable.virginmedia.com. [82.9.16.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k8sm2246815wia.6.2012.06.06.12.26.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 06 Jun 2012 12:26:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 20:23:40 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] About forcing rebuilds of other packages issue Message-ID: <20120606202340.6c95711f@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <1339010165.2706.62.camel@belkin4> References: <1338845178.23212.1.camel@belkin4> <4FCDFF18.3080600@gentoo.org> <1338903062.21833.7.camel@belkin4> <4FCE913C.5060104@gentoo.org> <1338971313.2706.4.camel@belkin4> <4FCF2012.3040500@gentoo.org> <1338976106.2706.36.camel@belkin4> <20120606181650.0c727f18@googlemail.com> <1339005744.2706.47.camel@belkin4> <20120606191505.4e011158@googlemail.com> <1339007452.2706.57.camel@belkin4> <20120606193348.67b83427@googlemail.com> <1339010165.2706.62.camel@belkin4> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/dGXfl0=Kxy6wNXA.iuHAOEG"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: ac50b3cf-b6df-4614-9452-df92954ace59 X-Archives-Hash: 5a51c34cb6adb0e1455835f268f7f73d --Sig_/dGXfl0=Kxy6wNXA.iuHAOEG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 21:16:05 +0200 Pacho Ramos wrote: > Well, I think reading this thread is more or less clear what it would > be supposed to do, also Zac suggested it and looks to have an idea > about what should it do. There's a big leap from "more or less clear" and "an idea" to the kind of knowledge we want to have. Think REQUIRED_USE for how this can go wrong... If you think ABI_SLOT is essential, why not try implementing it and trying it out in a large number of packages, and reporting your results? --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/dGXfl0=Kxy6wNXA.iuHAOEG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk/Prj8ACgkQ96zL6DUtXhEqywCgq80/IGRJXho3U7DJuP2/DTnD z+QAni1ujjeyX3PCZ8S14YuZv6VfwPY7 =1om8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/dGXfl0=Kxy6wNXA.iuHAOEG--