From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-52296-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1ScJy8-0003Gq-Sx
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 17:24:31 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BA98EE064F;
	Wed,  6 Jun 2012 17:24:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wg0-f53.google.com (mail-wg0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDDE2E07A3
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed,  6 Jun 2012 17:22:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wgbfm10 with SMTP id fm10so5807330wgb.10
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 10:22:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer
         :mime-version:content-type;
        bh=2Jhake/w1KF5LSY4+S4wEkcS8YyI39tJ0NIet2cbER4=;
        b=03NJkVW0R/qdkSnvZ3q1uew8m/AKlC5rx4KebO+hxoO+eRfyhN8qdF47EANA+eVJou
         H0/7iI46hVXUghkGFCpJOyfZrbF3qF27MBX0rKKdPs28faN5GNY+FvTZXypqBVr+m0rf
         3N1goeunub0jyi+rzNbofATYJCvxpOvyXkArSeLY7mxXsUjubW178HfOvB5W4/f8QwJe
         v2VtJ1XzfZFxaLklhq2a1iVyUdbXmCZR3TxkgMes+nihh7BE/znbgW7qTVeG7lTEUEXk
         3yUP/NnVPYg1oU5WFQPHHtXs7vwhNMrLxmHKhlc7PrZHic1hhzzGO/N49eWKfCYuowj6
         r/Pw==
Received: by 10.216.131.223 with SMTP id m73mr18334847wei.76.1339003376083;
        Wed, 06 Jun 2012 10:22:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (cpc13-broo7-2-0-cust130.14-2.cable.virginmedia.com. [82.9.16.131])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id eb8sm3555820wib.11.2012.06.06.10.22.54
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Wed, 06 Jun 2012 10:22:55 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 18:19:36 +0100
From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] About forcing rebuilds of other packages issue
Message-ID: <20120606181936.43da814c@googlemail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1338971528.2706.7.camel@belkin4>
References: <1338845178.23212.1.camel@belkin4>
	<4FCDFF18.3080600@gentoo.org>
	<1338903062.21833.7.camel@belkin4>
	<20120606063320.47454715@googlemail.com>
	<1338971528.2706.7.camel@belkin4>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1;
 boundary="Sig_/oOue=4+WJGUT/om4WCuEqXf"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Archives-Salt: 627bf9e6-7e28-49c4-9361-546f5b95a470
X-Archives-Hash: 23fb1af5cb463b0fc4be19f13a85907a

--Sig_/oOue=4+WJGUT/om4WCuEqXf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 10:32:08 +0200
Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > We do? Please tell us. I was under the impression that we still
> > didn't fully know what the problem was.
>=20
> Well, could you please let me know how to handle some issues already
> mentioned? For example:
> - Rebuild dbus-glib and gobject-introspection after major glib update.
> - Rebuild x11 drivers after xorg-update

Those are the ones we probably do understand. You just up the SLOT (and
if you really need to, use blockers between slots, although this is
discouraged in favour of writing better ebuilds), and everything that
build+run-deps upon these things uses :=3D dependencies.

> - Rebuild python/perl/ocaml stuff after python/perl/ocaml update

That depends. If you only have to do it after an upgrade, same
solution. If you have to do it with a rebuild too, then that's one of
the situations I claim we don't fully understand because no-one has
specified what the exact general problem is (although lots of people
have looked at one particular case and assumed that their case holds
for everything, which isn't true).

--=20
Ciaran McCreesh

--Sig_/oOue=4+WJGUT/om4WCuEqXf
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk/PkSsACgkQ96zL6DUtXhHoTQCgxfXAMct3r/iSPNq0l0n4ALS3
NUsAn0Z+ra95q6gBmy3EIWdYcn920CzY
=to9t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/oOue=4+WJGUT/om4WCuEqXf--