From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Sb58N-0000i6-TF for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 07:21:56 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 47497E07B7; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 07:21:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A200CE07B9 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 07:20:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (87-205-24-5.ip.netia.com.pl [87.205.24.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1AAE21B4008; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 07:20:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2012 09:22:04 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: cloos@jhcloos.com Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata/md5-cache Message-ID: <20120603092204.41c66ada@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; boundary="Sig_/3qxRqCJaY19e5jepWx7RjLw"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: a368c241-ebab-4d31-b3ad-0f73bddc8383 X-Archives-Hash: db403915fde0dac29ac51ce7e22301aa --Sig_/3qxRqCJaY19e5jepWx7RjLw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 02 Jun 2012 20:32:36 -0400 James Cloos wrote: > What's up with md5-cache? >=20 > Every syn has to pull the entire md5-cache hierarchy over again, as if > some daemon re-creates every file every day, rather than only > re-writing those files which need updates and adding/removing those > which need that. Heavy eclass modifications lately. If you sync less often than I do, you may think it's just broken -- but these are eclasses. > Even if only the files metatdata changes, that still adds a > significant cost to an rsync. I wonder when it will come to the point where git will be more efficient than rsync. Or maybe it would be already? --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/3qxRqCJaY19e5jepWx7RjLw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQEIAAYFAk/LEJwACgkQfXuS5UK5QB1fzwP/cq8Q5J2tqcPvOltJOnichfpe eAJW/1n0lRsiUMx4WF4KYGuEJSCe/BnDre1fzfDiCq1bUwF103czrIs6icF1CJAS twsS2u0VckEco/CO6mePb+hevvXz2yHMw9tBC6ggazSlDI7dVAxC/VJVZG9hHF1o TlzrbqHiKmOxQ0fpBws= =/aPt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/3qxRqCJaY19e5jepWx7RjLw--