From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SaCRf-0003o3-9Q for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 31 May 2012 20:58:11 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7CEC5E05DD; Thu, 31 May 2012 20:57:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yw0-f53.google.com (mail-yw0-f53.google.com [209.85.213.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E12BE04E7 for ; Thu, 31 May 2012 20:57:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhp26 with SMTP id 26so1226924yhp.40 for ; Thu, 31 May 2012 13:57:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=bVJKgWNHFYS6LE5+Nwls+CyEU5GPa1byvWpGxIS1Jzs=; b=dcmZjfJDwZs1klcffYPkTf7rbF+xt5eie/Pv0b2mnDmOmKh8JfevPhoaZBvCV1JObq BLeCmwbCWZ5W5EUymtP7lTTGfR7OEw3AV258h/6zJ/6eVMBx4s22FHfzEaNdacLzL1ML cqpJRcG/ugP9encpel9WXmLwsWAomHfcLYJq5Bf1NUA8gVviJE/ScNCL2lJSY9NVrSzr Z5ChRTkSctU+C0dUSYw85fq6oy28GTgF10fvgEib6wn/os5U4QO5fgUeokjq/SzHhbcw pm8nOxeiL3fWtuxY1AqnNEyvWkmnQ2BIVgS4vfKvX6ozmXpnGgr92iLK8f+9Ny3nn8/s NHAw== Received: by 10.60.7.4 with SMTP id f4mr142036oea.36.1338497836649; Thu, 31 May 2012 13:57:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-187-77-158.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.77.158]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hg10sm3340041obb.15.2012.05.31.13.57.15 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 31 May 2012 13:57:16 -0700 (PDT) Sender: William Hubbs Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 31 May 2012 15:57:14 -0500 Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 15:57:14 -0500 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Message-ID: <20120531205714.GA25021@linux1> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20120531195450.GA24805@linux1> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gKMricLos+KVdGMg" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: 3140c4bd-e9c4-48cd-8d46-2cebbb3532e9 X-Archives-Hash: e5bfaccf8f49ea25cc6e929d15ae1557 --gKMricLos+KVdGMg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 08:26:58PM +0000, Duncan wrote: > William Hubbs posted on Thu, 31 May 2012 14:54:50 -0500 as excerpted: >=20 > I don't know what's going to happen to all the overlays with the main=20 > tree switch to git, but won't that break various "overlay first"=20 > policies, say for the kde overlay? >=20 > Of course, if all the official overlays are converted to git branches of= =20 > the main tree... but won't they still require rebasing as they've already= =20 > been pushed? (This assumes your workaround idea doesn't work. If it=20 > does, great!) Overlays aren't really part of this discussion; those are independent trees which we have no control over, so commiting changes from overlays to the main tree is the responsibility of the overlay maintainers. William --gKMricLos+KVdGMg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk/H2yoACgkQblQW9DDEZTivgACdEovEExpTDNght3N9dnb7ysKw oz4Ani8ww29ziXHfr8BuRMw7miv9rWY3 =ndNS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gKMricLos+KVdGMg--