From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-52086-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1SaCRf-0003o3-9Q
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 31 May 2012 20:58:11 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7CEC5E05DD;
Thu, 31 May 2012 20:57:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-yw0-f53.google.com (mail-yw0-f53.google.com [209.85.213.53])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E12BE04E7
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 31 May 2012 20:57:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by yhp26 with SMTP id 26so1226924yhp.40
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 31 May 2012 13:57:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to
:user-agent;
bh=bVJKgWNHFYS6LE5+Nwls+CyEU5GPa1byvWpGxIS1Jzs=;
b=dcmZjfJDwZs1klcffYPkTf7rbF+xt5eie/Pv0b2mnDmOmKh8JfevPhoaZBvCV1JObq
BLeCmwbCWZ5W5EUymtP7lTTGfR7OEw3AV258h/6zJ/6eVMBx4s22FHfzEaNdacLzL1ML
cqpJRcG/ugP9encpel9WXmLwsWAomHfcLYJq5Bf1NUA8gVviJE/ScNCL2lJSY9NVrSzr
Z5ChRTkSctU+C0dUSYw85fq6oy28GTgF10fvgEib6wn/os5U4QO5fgUeokjq/SzHhbcw
pm8nOxeiL3fWtuxY1AqnNEyvWkmnQ2BIVgS4vfKvX6ozmXpnGgr92iLK8f+9Ny3nn8/s
NHAw==
Received: by 10.60.7.4 with SMTP id f4mr142036oea.36.1338497836649;
Thu, 31 May 2012 13:57:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-187-77-158.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.77.158])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hg10sm3340041obb.15.2012.05.31.13.57.15
(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Thu, 31 May 2012 13:57:16 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: William Hubbs <w.d.hubbs@gmail.com>
Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 31 May 2012 15:57:14 -0500
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 15:57:14 -0500
From: William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or
git-cvsserver
Message-ID: <20120531205714.GA25021@linux1>
Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
References: <CAKmKYaCgdi8uFssF=7rMhAunAs4=qRPgycT0uJYLVGQOhXkuLA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAGfcS_kezhc3ZyfU6Kt1kXCDZqd3VydTjF3BeSt2moEDkbaOSA@mail.gmail.com>
<pan.2012.05.30.13.06.45@cox.net>
<robbat2-20120530T183226-760252197Z@orbis-terrarum.net>
<CAKmKYaBPFXtgPVtY4UQvnD1AjN0oYRz0cDLmZuGzPNNSGnS9YQ@mail.gmail.com>
<robbat2-20120531T163959-415201853Z@orbis-terrarum.net>
<CAGfcS_mSMrS5oYJL3+v2qiCN=efNPestH3je2L7fLvmch2sdVQ@mail.gmail.com>
<robbat2-20120531T190511-495360338Z@orbis-terrarum.net>
<20120531195450.GA24805@linux1>
<pan.2012.05.31.20.26.58@cox.net>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gKMricLos+KVdGMg"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <pan.2012.05.31.20.26.58@cox.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Archives-Salt: 3140c4bd-e9c4-48cd-8d46-2cebbb3532e9
X-Archives-Hash: e5bfaccf8f49ea25cc6e929d15ae1557
--gKMricLos+KVdGMg
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 08:26:58PM +0000, Duncan wrote:
> William Hubbs posted on Thu, 31 May 2012 14:54:50 -0500 as excerpted:
>=20
> I don't know what's going to happen to all the overlays with the main=20
> tree switch to git, but won't that break various "overlay first"=20
> policies, say for the kde overlay?
>=20
> Of course, if all the official overlays are converted to git branches of=
=20
> the main tree... but won't they still require rebasing as they've already=
=20
> been pushed? (This assumes your workaround idea doesn't work. If it=20
> does, great!)
Overlays aren't really part of this discussion; those are independent
trees which we have no control over, so commiting changes from overlays
to the main tree is the responsibility of the overlay maintainers.
William
--gKMricLos+KVdGMg
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAk/H2yoACgkQblQW9DDEZTivgACdEovEExpTDNght3N9dnb7ysKw
oz4Ani8ww29ziXHfr8BuRMw7miv9rWY3
=ndNS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--gKMricLos+KVdGMg--