From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-52076-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1SaB27-0007D2-GH
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 31 May 2012 19:27:43 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DD4F2E0796;
Thu, 31 May 2012 19:27:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wg0-f53.google.com (mail-wg0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 608D9E0772
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 31 May 2012 19:26:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wgbfm10 with SMTP id fm10so1125196wgb.10
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 31 May 2012 12:26:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer
:mime-version:content-type;
bh=GdjO8V5DXxkX/QQqBwPfHkqXlNXAc00cH08Ph6CDhek=;
b=LiAu/G2EKI9attySTBub6kSTH2Al+cJriXsknK4KtV3baWZ4lqXYf0RRYWLI+Rgdpn
Ur7LInhv9tvC2gJ3/LoI8xdUNTXopMSOnZEcv8JvVKJejWdAPIYpY8VwQYfhF5Fr+bRi
h8XqUUMzprmMKBVZdUw/vx58U6V6UICOChbw7KP0e9zDxuSpAwXQvq4mzykiBYcqUcG2
4pRJ+co0eGCGxsvIyO63t5/RuEmG7UNl2YaA/0RxQPDdo5JOblSEliWebBlN8lqQ30hS
B8vt+RO6PKgMRZPDEUjFBk6uUCYWv8B2Te++dSn9M2Yu0MzQJXqFtZX6HwMeK8A2VVnQ
BjOA==
Received: by 10.216.196.90 with SMTP id q68mr15665422wen.130.1338492407570;
Thu, 31 May 2012 12:26:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (cpc13-broo7-2-0-cust130.14-2.cable.virginmedia.com. [82.9.16.131])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gc6sm5506340wib.0.2012.05.31.12.26.46
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Thu, 31 May 2012 12:26:47 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 20:23:31 +0100
From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or
git-cvsserver
Message-ID: <20120531202331.14f1a6c9@googlemail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120531191804.GA24784@linux1>
References: <ddd8ff651a1f5d00ea13fbd9e105ddfa@omrb.pnpi.spb.ru>
<CAGfcS_kOCDZ6Ur37+YYx4DR+1b3c-VWE6eNiefS7HJbqtuKKJA@mail.gmail.com>
<pan.2012.05.30.09.38.51@cox.net>
<CAKmKYaCgdi8uFssF=7rMhAunAs4=qRPgycT0uJYLVGQOhXkuLA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAGfcS_kezhc3ZyfU6Kt1kXCDZqd3VydTjF3BeSt2moEDkbaOSA@mail.gmail.com>
<pan.2012.05.30.13.06.45@cox.net>
<robbat2-20120530T183226-760252197Z@orbis-terrarum.net>
<CAKmKYaBPFXtgPVtY4UQvnD1AjN0oYRz0cDLmZuGzPNNSGnS9YQ@mail.gmail.com>
<robbat2-20120531T163959-415201853Z@orbis-terrarum.net>
<CAGfcS_mSMrS5oYJL3+v2qiCN=efNPestH3je2L7fLvmch2sdVQ@mail.gmail.com>
<20120531191804.GA24784@linux1>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1;
boundary="Sig_/BOrjr1MSFr9sLfki.Fbvz4Q"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Archives-Salt: e8652e2d-1482-458b-8dd2-bbafc6665494
X-Archives-Hash: c713b402c6c7898648ee84d92a8daf21
--Sig_/BOrjr1MSFr9sLfki.Fbvz4Q
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, 31 May 2012 14:18:04 -0500
William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > Not sure I'm following, but I will be the first to admit that I'm a
> > git novice. Would this be aided by a convention, like only
> > committing to master on the gentoo official repository, and any
> > on-the-side work on places like github/etc stays in branches?
> > Those repositories would just keep getting fed commits on master
> > from the official repository.
>=20
> Iagree with this; I think we should ban merge commits on master. That
> would force everyone to rebase their work on current master before
> they commit to master which would make the history clean.
So what's the point of switching to git if you want to ban the main
reason git exists?
--=20
Ciaran McCreesh
--Sig_/BOrjr1MSFr9sLfki.Fbvz4Q
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAk/HxTYACgkQ96zL6DUtXhHqYwCgtqBwzx2mxJs47+3lCD0kD//s
tvoAoMs1j379anBFfIgKULMbxPH0uv37
=A0fP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Sig_/BOrjr1MSFr9sLfki.Fbvz4Q--