From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SYeug-0004nP-BA for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 27 May 2012 14:57:46 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D2188E0776; Sun, 27 May 2012 14:57:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-f181.google.com (mail-ob0-f181.google.com [209.85.214.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F8FFE0764 for ; Sun, 27 May 2012 14:56:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbuo19 with SMTP id uo19so4902160obb.40 for ; Sun, 27 May 2012 07:56:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=gSWNEk4+gyCnhH4OxVgDAKrJJon5kYy20AMFwSdQQaU=; b=T4azSUSNkROTFAvQv02rVTtDYbgp+JQTHgjjMn1uSfaVxhGA7CjrWQMo00jqlh1rI/ /LxnvYeLGrPEy4yGARc6gKmG+iD23zlNDPlGvUR0u7e+J8bJvINUkfMj1vpSoj9VGqM0 CeZTTjvKmiddm/7KIduW9+fBV62CJmQm3TVgmK6iVEScRmC5zGozyHv+SzmNECgRNy2F gGjw9orENq5AyG4W39Cz3I++KBKWROjrjG5Ovlm85wnHtdLL1X0NOiAUxaEDa08M9nBO bdHfN0+cMlavSyYdbtZMGswdy3Wd1boB0bKUic56iYQ1MnVW/q2FDE8sBLptQ6hf4It3 1QHw== Received: by 10.60.14.41 with SMTP id m9mr5293763oec.57.1338130618806; Sun, 27 May 2012 07:56:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-187-77-158.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.77.158]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id yw3sm6900730obb.7.2012.05.27.07.56.56 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 27 May 2012 07:56:58 -0700 (PDT) Sender: William Hubbs Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 27 May 2012 09:56:56 -0500 Date: Sun, 27 May 2012 09:56:56 -0500 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: OpenRC Networking Scripts Message-ID: <20120527145656.GA5206@linux1> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20120526194025.GA16393@linux1> <4FC23EE3.4060208@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FC23EE3.4060208@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: 5d633310-09ea-473e-a00b-44ba981713a9 X-Archives-Hash: 72d749a6956079d0f5efe1d46a3a6e2a --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 10:49:07AM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 >=20 > On 26/05/12 03:40 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > > All, > >=20 > > I realize this has been discussed and there are definite opinions > > about which method works well. So, I want to take a different > > approach. > >=20 > > Is there any interest in documenting and supporting newnet along > > side oldnet as opposed to killing newnet? > >=20 > > Newnet would consist of the "network" init script to set up your=20 > > loopback interface along with something like dhcpcd, > > networkmanager, or wicd (and wpa_supplicant for wireless > > interfaces) running in standalone mode to manage your other > > interfaces. > >=20 > > My understanding of the way newnet works is that the big advantage > > would come for workstations that have a simple network setup and > > where users would want hotplugged interfaces to just work. > >=20 > > Any thoughts? > >=20 > > William > >=20 >=20 >=20 > Just want to point out that my hotplugged interfaces work great with > oldnet. Actually they don't, because we don't make or remove the net.* symlinks in /etc/init.d for the hotplugged interfaces when the interfaces are added or removed. William --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEUEARECAAYFAk/CQLgACgkQblQW9DDEZTiFIACgm+iowqLqNp9kNHGgc9tsx5jl 12MAmNFuugwgE4ny5UNJ6RrVErYvcgU= =CkpB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx--