From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SSZke-0000ax-QT for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 10 May 2012 20:14:17 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 20191E0C35; Thu, 10 May 2012 20:13:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE26BE0C4A for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 20:12:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (87-205-63-172.adsl.inetia.pl [87.205.63.172]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F37CB1B4008; Thu, 10 May 2012 20:12:46 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 22:13:33 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012] Message-ID: <20120510221333.7095ebf5@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <20120510205940.544bbc0f@googlemail.com> References: <4F8503DF.1010802@gentoo.org> <4F85E21C.4060106@gentoo.org> <20120423012540.GA2130@waltdnes.org> <20120505010529.GD22763@kroah.com> <20120509183203.GA27545@kroah.com> <4FAC1D16.9080301@gentoo.org> <20120510205940.544bbc0f@googlemail.com> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; boundary="Sig_/xU.wFWOQeMSZDWX+islU2Iv"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: e518bef4-c2d3-45e8-9282-3b6ceb873144 X-Archives-Hash: 131b59f1014f875a1c7fbe5217387c1e --Sig_/xU.wFWOQeMSZDWX+islU2Iv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 10 May 2012 20:59:40 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 >=20 > On Thu, 10 May 2012 20:55:02 +0100 > Markos Chandras wrote: > > Make a constructive criticism if you really need to rant about > > software that nobody forces you to use. >=20 > Not that I agree with anything Fabio has ever said, but I believe the > issue under discussion here is that tight coupling and vertical > integration means we are in effect forced to use rather a lot of > software that we would prefer not to. No, I don't think you are forced to use anything. As was proven before, there are always alternatives. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/xU.wFWOQeMSZDWX+islU2Iv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQEIAAYFAk+sIW0ACgkQfXuS5UK5QB3TRwQAinMsVhc1HTI5SMuxIYfDKHU3 SLRagPN+Df9NC2GRAP0eqKJK3gHIq6fRPOFrsw/NriA3qNYl2qA6w5ET3Fvn1+QV FJSuufQbsnBih4rHEgwD0LfQngUW0d+Xudh/PNnRHtC2ulE0IAovL/bsulKHVku1 QjgL6/qC/0MYmBdlJH4= =IkZR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/xU.wFWOQeMSZDWX+islU2Iv--