From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-51561-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1SSBh6-0004vw-Or
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 09 May 2012 18:33:01 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BDE00E097B;
	Wed,  9 May 2012 18:32:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18396E095F
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed,  9 May 2012 18:32:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.43])
	by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 464D421232
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed,  9 May 2012 14:32:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend2.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.161])
  by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 09 May 2012 14:32:05 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
	messagingengine.com; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=smtpout;
	 bh=tDVyacOy+C4zGiGfsbVfVisS+30=; b=ZbnN4K1x7dA7leRR3B69wHXOapwr
	iFWFthiFhpw52s6UOf2Zdozc0A4kPWxg8tnem5mnGm1VzBdiGtoFk/hh7P4Yy1z/
	DjZlt132DPlQymFlB8XmiPZr5Er3mly7bcyUbqLXGyh7NpbTg6OlWhUVKVGU3cRJ
	HsTS9t9fybmBWLc=
X-Sasl-enc: BODzSX6OinZQma9Sg5W8gRpl3Q36FqjAkj+gIZj3wGzp 1336588324
Received: from localhost (c-67-168-183-230.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [67.168.183.230])
	by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C12C1482601;
	Wed,  9 May 2012 14:32:04 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 11:32:03 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting
 summary for 3 April 2012]
Message-ID: <20120509183203.GA27545@kroah.com>
References: <4F8503DF.1010802@gentoo.org>
 <jm43b9$a0e$1@dough.gmane.org>
 <4F85E21C.4060106@gentoo.org>
 <jmvr06$96o$1@dough.gmane.org>
 <CAGfcS_nPz=6kGg49kwZ-6GGAeB0fixzUQxyyXbU8-bbO0ndKng@mail.gmail.com>
 <jn04lk$q2i$1@dough.gmane.org>
 <20120423012540.GA2130@waltdnes.org>
 <jo0q2n$ebp$1@dough.gmane.org>
 <20120505010529.GD22763@kroah.com>
 <jo9t9m$aql$1@dough.gmane.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <jo9t9m$aql$1@dough.gmane.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Archives-Salt: d94ab096-2ac7-42c7-80aa-80b6f1de2f30
X-Archives-Hash: b42b6a58596a04901324e9485d53d0d4

On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 02:40:41AM +0100, Steven J Long wrote:
> OFC you could just assure us that udev will never rely on systemd as a 
> design decision. I can understand that systemd might need close integration 
> with the underlying udev implementation[PS].

Nope, can't make that assurance at all.

Actually, maybe I can make the opposite assurance, let's see what the
future brings... :)

greg k-h