From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SRWMV-0003VZ-1D for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 07 May 2012 22:24:59 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4E6B9E0920; Mon, 7 May 2012 22:24:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ironport-out.teksavvy.com (ironport-out.teksavvy.com [206.248.143.162]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AF65E0AB4 for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 22:23:55 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApUIACxOgk9FxIBh/2dsb2JhbABDuCMDgQyBCIIJAQEFOhwzCxgcEhQlN4gOtjKLYYFVgkFjBI1vh3yGAohYgV2DAw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,391,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="178854651" Received: from 69-196-128-97.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO waltdnes.org) ([69.196.128.97]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with SMTP; 07 May 2012 18:23:53 -0400 Received: by waltdnes.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 07 May 2012 18:23:15 -0400 From: "Walter Dnes" Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 18:23:15 -0400 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Chromium bundled code Message-ID: <20120507222314.GA16470@waltdnes.org> References: <4F9E44D0.70002@linx.net> <201205031918.48928.vapier@gentoo.org> <4FA32795.6000809@gentoo.org> <201205032122.12231.vapier@gentoo.org> <20120504213546.GA8823@waltdnes.org> <4FA44FA1.4060101@gentoo.org> <20120505005945.GB22763@kroah.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120505005945.GB22763@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: 7776fc97-deb7-4da3-86d5-755c97294d5f X-Archives-Hash: 57f6f5b490a19c10ab056c16d3ca499a On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 05:59:45PM -0700, Greg KH wrote > On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 02:52:33PM -0700, Luca Barbato wrote: > > On 04/05/12 14:35, Walter Dnes wrote: > > > What could work is a shim or compatability layer that gets > > > called, and pre-processes requests and forwards them to mdev. > > > > That's my idea =) > > and then, look, you have reimplemented udev. > > {sigh} Actually, more like what udev *USED TO BE*, namely a simple devicei manager. -- Walter Dnes