From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-51389-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1SQAUt-0006E4-Ob
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 04 May 2012 04:52:03 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 03E07E08BA;
	Fri,  4 May 2012 04:51:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1F83E080A
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri,  4 May 2012 04:50:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from epia.jer-c2.orkz.net (D4B2706A.static.ziggozakelijk.nl [212.178.112.106])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: jer)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A92421B4017
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri,  4 May 2012 04:50:17 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 06:50:12 +0200
From: Jeroen Roovers <jer@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: epatch_user usage
Message-ID: <20120504065012.03864982@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net>
In-Reply-To: <4F98D7C0.6060006@gentoo.org>
References: <CAFWqQMRpR9wHD8o5KygqtkzT9MJYUV_Ug_1GC58VYVFtrkLrkA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120425224505.5e2c7c82@gentoo.org>
	<4F98D7C0.6060006@gentoo.org>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.8; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 42e1b749-2d34-401e-bf0f-160843b7011e
X-Archives-Hash: 240fd77e58fadd9da4b727deb1db28f7

On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 22:06:08 -0700
Zac Medico <zmedico@gentoo.org> wrote:

> On 04/25/2012 09:45 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > Could we detect user patches touching autoconf files somehow, maybe
> > by hashing them beforehand 
> 
> There's an implementation of that inside autotools-utils_src_prepare.

There's all kinds of reasons to not use autotools-utils.eclass.
I wouldn't want to see another python.eclass bullying around the tree.


Sincerely,
    jer