On Monday 30 April 2012 12:32:35 Matt Turner wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Monday 30 April 2012 12:00:59 Rich Freeman wrote:
> >> doing it wrong.  I don't like how Google develops Android in the dark,
> >> or that they bundle 1GB of third-party stuff in their Chromium source
> >> and distribute a favored binary-only derivative.
> > 
> > err, they distribute a Chromium source tarball, and their build system
> > includes flags to use the system versions of those bundled libs if you so
> > choose.  i think this is a perfectly fine compromise.
> 
> It looks like chromium-20.0.1115.1.ebuild removes 45 bundled
> libraries

to be sure the system ones get used

> and still has TODOs in place to use the system's ffmpeg,
> hunspell, (Open?)SSL, SQLite, and libvpx.

it's on going work :).  ffmpeg/libvpx are a bit harder as Chromium syncs faster 
than they make releases i believe.
-mike