From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SNqra-0006Kw-5w for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 19:29:54 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D89C5E0A4A; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 19:29:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com (mail-we0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C6DDE09F6 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 19:28:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by werm13 with SMTP id m13so764825wer.40 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 12:28:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; bh=lbV8MIcmlLP0vYllG5LH8P1K88Bzg43H7z5GYcrabBM=; b=HUl5MirrK0QwsJxssHXfMZY4cckid0w8tjlwZYpmY3EncRCLZa7lPmw4FpMkGTQnbw SACbxdINshGMqS1fi8AE05/eR6wMyPZlFBXVwx7sls54UAllShn4ww6YLd0diCqE5hbk +zN4L8b/8MFy6Iw9rSYxOFxx8TdtxisaXqsxokS3wu4f321GK3bMq2PwLkW63LV8SIe7 8iNTOXk+K1yWHgPiZ5t0hM8o5Ed75DjN9VHCunt8xMGGQUGWoXO0dDR469yp/dCOZCVY siuFSnfsi6XbZx8BLyXwsci1J2HaWBVYPdDQZ+kXZ9o4i8JoHMzW7vXzLioROsQkBmij k36Q== Received: by 10.180.106.9 with SMTP id gq9mr8686831wib.17.1335554917208; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 12:28:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc13-broo7-2-0-cust130.14-2.cable.virginmedia.com. [82.9.16.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u9sm6675468wix.0.2012.04.27.12.28.36 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 27 Apr 2012 12:28:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 20:26:14 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Making user patches globally available Message-ID: <20120427202614.0edd9c24@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <20378.57067.381372.698034@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> References: <20120415021641.1858ffde@gentoo.org> <4F8A885C.3050508@gentoo.org> <20120418185913.3d2fa68f@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> <201204181340.00474.vapier@gentoo.org> <20120418184138.50153e57@googlemail.com> <4F8F05E9.5070103@gentoo.org> <4F8F0929.2010109@googlemail.com> <4F8F18EC.3000707@gentoo.org> <4F8F3513.2060202@googlemail.com> <20120425224433.2fa0f2de@gentoo.org> <4F98EA90.4000403@gentoo.org> <4F9967DE.8000601@gentoo.org> <4F99F941.90705@gentoo.org> <20120427162051.13554e1a@pomiocik.lan> <4F9AD51F.6060303@gentoo.org> <20378.57067.381372.698034@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/cknc2U7cRPGKobjnRCpwWru"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 4dbc83de-123d-40b7-9110-8d87e70ab77e X-Archives-Hash: 34f9864d04b4b24d7234e67d0102f018 --Sig_/cknc2U7cRPGKobjnRCpwWru Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 20:01:15 +0200 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > Since we've managed to survive up to this point without such a > > feature, I think it's worth the wait roll it into EAPI 5 and have a > > clean solution that doesn't rely on package manager interaction with > > eclasses. If we quickly draft an EAPI 5 spec, there's still have > > time to have it approved at the next council meeting. >=20 > Did I get it right, you are thinking about a special EAPI only for > user patches? I'd say that the feature is not important enough to > justify that. Didn't we have a few other cheap things lined up? --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/cknc2U7cRPGKobjnRCpwWru Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk+a8tkACgkQ96zL6DUtXhHCUgCggMiJZ/uk5o+NxpbXhS0kvzQI 3qMAoI12CcWZBkfWAL8wKp0ix7HxtR16 =JQ68 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/cknc2U7cRPGKobjnRCpwWru--