From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SNne7-0002bq-6i for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:03:47 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7AA0DE0833; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:03:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f53.google.com (mail-wg0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6FD2E067D for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:02:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbfm10 with SMTP id fm10so812371wgb.10 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 09:02:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; bh=Vv+a1C64npEmY5LW7hLca/mpuqMLg82Kt0IYJY04kXU=; b=ZwkL2xZBgYX3fk3/HMK3OLAUIN54KOnxMrKuDFq5elyNoQMvp3HJTJqS5I8x2vCFlc cENw2AOFL/4h70cstRa35epzV/6T4K67+y+kSn1EXdr9AUlLD+AfMtQw1fC9D9+mSp8u msDQb3Al85n8CKsqPZXOksgeiW6jHXQNOyFJB1mE6ftfyzP64aYWbt6AceVU19PK4Uwb dO9vy5tbXCc6Sr6jCurRRrUlextM7eTH67+QztdKKSB7unona6qgtM0LUsqEd1gICYqY y0A0x1YeVS2qfrNgwEYisywbLPEd+E/+521UzYntWPnHWx6OCh2uDaPNAPdWhHo++9L5 blvw== Received: by 10.180.81.37 with SMTP id w5mr7257533wix.16.1335542571046; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 09:02:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc13-broo7-2-0-cust130.14-2.cable.virginmedia.com. [82.9.16.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 17sm5527613wis.0.2012.04.27.09.02.49 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 27 Apr 2012 09:02:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:00:29 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Making user patches globally available Message-ID: <20120427170029.44eb6eb3@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <4F9AC185.1000708@gentoo.org> References: <20120415021641.1858ffde@gentoo.org> <4F8A885C.3050508@gentoo.org> <20120418185913.3d2fa68f@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> <201204181340.00474.vapier@gentoo.org> <20120418184138.50153e57@googlemail.com> <4F8F05E9.5070103@gentoo.org> <4F8F0929.2010109@googlemail.com> <4F8F18EC.3000707@gentoo.org> <4F8F3513.2060202@googlemail.com> <20120425224433.2fa0f2de@gentoo.org> <4F98EA90.4000403@gentoo.org> <4F9967DE.8000601@gentoo.org> <4F99F941.90705@gentoo.org> <20120427152709.14a6c0bf@googlemail.com> <4F9ABE2F.8050006@gentoo.org> <20120427164549.052d85be@googlemail.com> <4F9AC185.1000708@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/u=3qsMj1PlLZity3ZUhUKD="; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: e17ddff3-6188-49b4-8c06-0a72c64aa868 X-Archives-Hash: 5e41b4347d0bed713233c8f08934e940 --Sig_/u=3qsMj1PlLZity3ZUhUKD= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 08:55:49 -0700 Zac Medico wrote: > I suppose that we could do it both ways. The repoman check would be > for people who want a practical approach that doesn't require all > ebuilds to be converted to EAPI 5, and your strict die approach would > be for people who want strictness and can afford to wait for the > relevant ebuilds to be converted to EAPI 5. But there's no way the repoman check is going to give anything like reliable answers if you're involving eclasses... --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/u=3qsMj1PlLZity3ZUhUKD= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk+awqAACgkQ96zL6DUtXhFZPgCguVPyEoWjuxRMi6rjF79ZKFW6 bXYAn3VQkFy3BTOgQNwXjAXR77KZh72L =LZnJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/u=3qsMj1PlLZity3ZUhUKD=--