From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SMilO-0006gk-1Z for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:38:50 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 438C8E0BA4; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:38:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 043EDE09EA for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:37:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (77-253-150-60.adsl.inetia.pl [77.253.150.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 35C841B401E; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:37:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:38:26 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: robbat2@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New third party mirrors Message-ID: <20120424183826.499652b0@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: References: <20120424130959.GB13543@falgoret> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; boundary="Sig_/eTyeVyrN2b/fq8LlVhaa=Xq"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 50a19f09-60eb-40d3-94af-21027d5a3ed0 X-Archives-Hash: ff80f788726606dd9dae006dc0b88c1a --Sig_/eTyeVyrN2b/fq8LlVhaa=Xq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:19:11 +0000 "Robin H. Johnson" wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 04:50:49PM +0200, Corentin Chary wrote: > > >> $ ./mirrors.py --all --count > > >> 297 ?? ?? http://pear.php.net > > >> 297 ?? ?? http://pear.php.net/get > > >> 88 ?? ?? ??http://pecl.php.net > > >> 88 ?? ?? ??http://pecl.php.net/get > > > These are already mirror bouncers. If you visit the above, you'll > > > get the closest mirror for downloading. > > And since there is already ~10 "mirrors" with only one actual > > backend, should they go to thirdpartymirrors or not ? If not, what > > about this pseudo-mirrors already present in thirdpartymirrors ? > I think we should add the pseudo-mirrors, but explicitly mark them as > such in the file, so that they don't get duplicate entries added (eg > adding us.pear, de.pear and the pear bouncer is bad. Should have just > the bouncer). It'd be great if we could add some kind of additional mirror entries, which would be used by repoman to signal missing mirror:// entries but won't be used for downloads. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/eTyeVyrN2b/fq8LlVhaa=Xq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQEIAAYFAk+W1wMACgkQfXuS5UK5QB2WiAP+JciOojhJxNwL9R9jeZeQ5DQh emSp5zo9XonLlp+iM4M+SURR7ffM0fxNny1lGu3Milia5T1tkC5tVxcFAp7B6mJV Apwhz9qTZz8Leu0z3f04Sed+ZtHwu57VOa9hwwVYQQqhWokEvob3jNs1ov911wg3 AmraJ5Q489tfeo1xRxo= =yEPq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/eTyeVyrN2b/fq8LlVhaa=Xq--