From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SLJzR-0000jF-Fh for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 19:59:38 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E6A36E0999; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 19:59:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23F7DE077C for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 19:58:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E2621B4043; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 19:58:35 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] epatch: splitting out common options from user-specific ones Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 15:59:38 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.4.0-rc1; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Leho Kraav References: <25544530.1346.1334950699692.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbpz13> In-Reply-To: <25544530.1346.1334950699692.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbpz13> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3095860.usyQZUTbPm"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201204201559.39849.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: dff9b63e-b224-479c-8b86-cd18b3709bd5 X-Archives-Hash: 6c404fde73c777467a52eb16d9661f8c --nextPart3095860.usyQZUTbPm Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Friday 20 April 2012 15:38:19 Leho Kraav wrote: > On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 9:10:02 PM UTC+3, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > it isn't uncommon for people to want to force the patch (-p#) or fuzz > > (-f#) level when applying specific patches. but it is unusual that they > > want to kill off the extra options: -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch. so > > i'd like to split these off and improve the epatch API. >=20 > LOL mike, i'm fighting with this thing at the very moment. there's a patch > i received that has whitespace issues and i'd like to specify custom > EPATCH_OPTS. >=20 > i applied the patch to my eclass overlay, and einfo is showing that the n= ew > eclass is used. i just committed it since no one responded. so sync up. > $ EPATCH_OPTS=3D"--ignore-whitespace" emerge -va pf-sources that's not the intention. EPATCH_OPTS modification should be inside the=20 ebuild. =2Dmike --nextPart3095860.usyQZUTbPm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJPkcArAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBEb4P/3k7bhZ6Vqxggx9Bq5KDjFG5 pUcM6Dw8rBrkUo0hP6cGCM1yO3BqIZNML7W9flYJObQjD5ZgNKCOxoTP3xHo5jzB NbtW1QJL11QcEOCvmx06s+N8Zio+AwxORRW+rbirEuysdWM4wRccXrVd5osJhV1H xAjMTXdO98CYlAfkg8F3kWRYdlWjPvZX6KxzwrT06Kc3TKO5ZdmZPr+I6WwJ3izx 4vbLBuJ1Xr+QyyTDQuS48FClLZ2ugj9lwxBhDmqEmcp9JpCwGBnQkjs7oP46+PTB 9g1YT+Ebi3SEr4zF9R5WuS1nr4KNmC9UAt4wiHqp1/2uRvWW7H0tShg4VbI0SYI2 99rlPmPFSjDwWxYr+SZVdUkKpVVy76mtavCfBodtMnocRINX0LLf1+VLcC/7wz1Y NkZWIl8SdT8QbNPr5Q+8RVRXIUEBdYrxw4qYqfHq2enDUUk0nDzMhBuXdMp+dUZk 2fFEiNRRxGM8hxzwKvxZYczXdUa9Tmby8xHOr2NfrfaxgP6X1xN93zSW0AP9Ccbi ujiDQ9a9SmA7vkftYmoqb/YKHGPfArpdeGJ3Oq7blkSEaotRvrRNx9v/+1A2vga4 FyeMU/zf5YbvN8AemZI7zsWmDdc4m66d6kq9hu/ZPvCvmRhlXN7W7FC7irJ2d9tQ UaZ0+datpraaN6Xiy52v =M6JY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3095860.usyQZUTbPm--