From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SK9o0-0004qY-3w for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 14:54:56 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 60C12E0665; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 14:54:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 363CAE065A for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 14:53:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A64E31B4006 for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 14:53:39 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Is gcc-4.7.0 going to be in portage tree anytime soon? Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 10:54:19 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.4.0-rc1; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <4F8D71F3.5040606@blackhole.sk> <1412170.B5RVRSouU4@devil> In-Reply-To: <1412170.B5RVRSouU4@devil> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1651024.tUe0JRIYVy"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201204171054.20374.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: b1856e26-15ad-4917-af4c-5c00afe61f6e X-Archives-Hash: f18fd229b9174fa11c6f1abb2cd39b0a --nextPart1651024.tUe0JRIYVy Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tuesday 17 April 2012 09:40:22 Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > On Tuesday 17 April 2012 15:36:51 kabel wrote: > > Hello there, I just wanted to ask when an ebuild for gcc-4.7.0 will be > > in portage tree (unkeyworded, I suppose, like 4.6.0-4.6.2 are). >=20 > You can just follow the version bump request: > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D409315 yes, please follow the bugs rather than posting to the gentoo-dev list =2Dmike --nextPart1651024.tUe0JRIYVy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJPjYQcAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WB7dQP/1aj4a0sJlXG9y17HpvzzwF2 x0IX71pyniY3LUWoaduYgIvkcGJNNUGK6ry6b4g02TFZvFpBqJu8bMqnM+ugXj/2 2S0mSlXRnFrdFLRIEShyIVmpv2MXFDM4Lmr67J2nuhzi+kcfLUWgPxNJDW+8fFPJ xjo5TPP1JBUNgbq7gezJJ2XsN+Hd9hR7octzonRKskr1iTiZLvevREBjrttdsSoP lA8KYTVlxD3JG5wBkGjESqm1urgAM9NbeOCeDPG6zdHfB1PaL0/8NMnaTYnaPmDx 9mJWaCltQ3s8+5A3LoIASDrg13xb9lfvzwGi7HBUnMCnvUQqIaXNIxSTuhA4wa3I 3W092cL+GYzUUox3Az3IxFHRhzC5lXkw6Bv8LfplR9P8O9TuzYrb+xWbdRRFoU7l vaRx/Sdv+hL29IiFdjJezPd8f68dxBqwR3YH+jR/ZMPqeTIh+3C0t5gnoE+dyPnj ikiQgCJh2zYzyRizrgxUr6vXYsz9br91/AwNTLJqOYLMxcazD76R+CbqzuL4JK9j t53g8rLs98w3GUYYDMDJjBWYR8gGzQuMSB6NMEC9+7++2gTkzFplwf69Y1Y+k69G 0QB3SgEIAk+y0KUxFdXcgiF2/51KHl6yZz0jhaSMBzZHpEZBIbZtmxR2dokBMLoz SDdt6UzdOo7XZeFCHyXU =ZGvE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1651024.tUe0JRIYVy--