From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SJaNa-0000b6-NO for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 01:05:18 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 32B7BE0D8C; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 01:05:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BA95E0D6F for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 01:04:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from epia.jer-c2.orkz.net (D4B2706A.static.ziggozakelijk.nl [212.178.112.106]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jer) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5FF3A1B405E for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 01:04:07 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 03:04:01 +0200 From: Jeroen Roovers To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About adding a way to check for bugs referring to no longer existing packages in the tree Message-ID: <20120416030401.16d3efeb@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> In-Reply-To: <1334483704.2557.3.camel@belkin4> References: <1334401347.3181.2.camel@belkin4> <20120414124245.323cba48@gentoo.org> <1334426068.3181.11.camel@belkin4> <20120415024729.52e5d909@gentoo.org> <1334483704.2557.3.camel@belkin4> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.8; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: adf38473-9060-4848-8cdc-8ddadeacc922 X-Archives-Hash: 972e1c84484cdd6359bbbf6f5bf73f1c On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 11:55:04 +0200 Pacho Ramos wrote: > Well, I currently manually do eix searching to check it, maybe would > be a way to compare eix outputs with "${CATEGORY}/${PKGNAME}" from bug > summaries (bugs without that naming structure would be uncovered by > this, but we would still be able to easily check for obsolete bug > reports). I only started fixing summaries to include valid, canonical cat/pkg[-ver] strings a few years ago because searching for a full atom in bugzilla's search would otherwise (and still does) fail. Before that it was mayhem, and it's mainly the older bugs you appear be worried about. Having a list of bugs to fix the cat/pkg for would have more uses than the one you're interested in. jer