From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SJav8-0005oG-MT for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 01:39:58 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DEF66E0E45; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 01:39:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E620E0E2F for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 01:39:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A029B1B4065 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 01:39:07 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About adding a way to check for bugs referring to no longer existing packages in the tree Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 21:39:36 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.4.0-rc1; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <1334401347.3181.2.camel@belkin4> <1334483704.2557.3.camel@belkin4> <20120416030401.16d3efeb@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> In-Reply-To: <20120416030401.16d3efeb@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2436166.gOk9hlq5VY"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201204152139.37132.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 581511e3-b39c-47f3-a0c3-8f0c7cbd1a36 X-Archives-Hash: cd724278144ca557b4c022ad83f63de0 --nextPart2436166.gOk9hlq5VY Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sunday 15 April 2012 21:04:01 Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 11:55:04 +0200 Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Well, I currently manually do eix searching to check it, maybe would > > be a way to compare eix outputs with "${CATEGORY}/${PKGNAME}" from bug > > summaries (bugs without that naming structure would be uncovered by > > this, but we would still be able to easily check for obsolete bug > > reports). >=20 > I only started fixing summaries to include valid, canonical > cat/pkg[-ver] strings a few years ago because searching for a full > atom in bugzilla's search would otherwise (and still does) fail. +1 i'm a bit more anal and generally prefer it to be the first item in the sum= mary=20 as it makes scanning through summaries much easier. having an arbitrary=20 series of words before it makes it a bit harder imo. =2Dmike --nextPart2436166.gOk9hlq5VY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJPi3hZAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBGywP/RyEHjW5Axjo4nAJfLP9EseC UAaIvP1EjW2KoqC7wu7fKrj6aCJKdy/OI10FQnxkOXyLu0njy04VX8jX1XkXy2WX PymWJC1jwFVnyoDshLXpsSnACYl0ujkie506OQw/quJUt+Rqhq+5gz/eikMg2s6x vFGJ0DDs+Cpd0tzttomB5Bn/LUNCKcfSSWCQwDgwFaltpt5ujCrqOJTxrPr2T2Lk bjED5qOLdB75BodBuLz0DkE4p7XsRczKJFtBFTSAIQDczMTXxBy6sYqpWJWZmnw2 +XpT7k2ja8xmNcwMFqD9ig6wksWzsa4j5WarQM3h5ojRu3QvCv209gkABsnx+PE4 3Sg0PJj7epALQD3vFls1A4qf9CCXWbo5Su0JfmowHQ/gVB6RTC8EZAtUEG5AMj+r eV1ZhabXA3OXM9LnIgz+JK3yE48Uzic6du6Mo8TevKhlwMxI30f4KU6i3Dvmix5f GYTQcqSflg5khMvqWPngM0keByWI9Y57xX6K8lPJKHmKVxvmcA0UQaGTjcgk88cx 6rRihPPj0yDsuHMEzifCK40oXulqt5raYBQGdwZjgho2o+Nmf8l2+PFIjMElDl3B q1tHktsKDjjDn6Wce12Bd3OXsgXGGNdE9d2Ls5aKmCvhJuUyceyOhwKY3gB0r6eo UZtO3Ib8CBFHkwDYTiwP =UEdK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2436166.gOk9hlq5VY--