public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: pacho@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] About validate_desktop_entries in eutils.eclass
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 16:23:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120415162354.13870bd0@pomiocik.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1334499131.2557.12.camel@belkin4>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1028 bytes --]

On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 16:12:11 +0200
Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> wrote:

> El dom, 15-04-2012 a las 16:02 +0200, Michał Górny escribió:
> > On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 11:59:50 +0200
> > Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > I am unsure about validate_desktop_entries() utility. It's
> > > currently provided by eutils.eclass and only called by
> > > net-firewall/fwbuilder. Shouldn't this be moved to a "qa" check?
> > > Current way is pretty useless as it's not used by most of
> > > packages, and calling it from a lot of eclasses/ebuilds doesn't
> > > sound me like a good idea.
> > > 
> > > What do you think?
> > 
> > Agreed. It should be in repoman.
> > 
> 
> The check needs to be run over desktop file going to be installed, not
> sure how repoman can handle it, it looked to me more like a emerge job
> (like is done with other qa checks run before installation)

Tfu, you're right. It should be in *however portage calls it runtime QA
thingy* :P.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 316 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-15 14:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-15  9:59 [gentoo-dev] About validate_desktop_entries in eutils.eclass Pacho Ramos
2012-04-15 10:20 ` Samuli Suominen
2012-04-15 14:02 ` Michał Górny
2012-04-15 14:12   ` Pacho Ramos
2012-04-15 14:23     ` Michał Górny [this message]
2012-04-29 16:45     ` Petteri Räty
2012-04-30 17:05       ` Zac Medico
2012-04-30 17:50         ` Pacho Ramos

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120415162354.13870bd0@pomiocik.lan \
    --to=mgorny@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    --cc=pacho@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox