From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SIQUf-0006EB-3H for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 20:19:49 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C7E7FE0F27; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 20:19:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 228E7E0D82 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 20:18:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83A531B401C; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 20:18:34 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:19:22 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.4.0-rc1; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Ulrich Mueller References: <20359.12963.800450.626163@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> In-Reply-To: <20359.12963.800450.626163@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2024690.ud9DsC8oiF"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201204121619.23131.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 6a5759e1-59eb-4d9c-a853-320022e04b02 X-Archives-Hash: 2b99bb5bdc85988ced086e04bac9009e --nextPart2024690.ud9DsC8oiF Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thursday 12 April 2012 15:53:07 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > There is consensus in the gentoo-pms mailing list that we should > tighten the rules for the position of the EAPI assignment in ebuilds, > namely that it should take place in the first non-blank and > non-comment line. >=20 > The devmanual already requires that "if you want to override the EAPI > variable, you have to specify it at the top of the ebuild." >=20 > In any case, the portage tree mostly complies with this. There are 130 > ebuilds in 66 packages (or 0.4 % of the total number) that don't, but > they can be trivially fixed (and I volunteer to do the work). do it =2Dmike --nextPart2024690.ud9DsC8oiF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJPhzjLAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBn8gQAIKwgtALXJid9lRgxa1vRcF7 GQqu8ZX2FN+ZU8CKmP0nGlxRxyDPZQVaJnB0encyr3z+0JdF0cCB4IGtUaOpRAD2 jN8sjuXNZLnls0OohyQehZF6C4rdo67Xv4oB/J8yWWTXEKKNWnwJjesaIhzu9Qqk wK9+EZNCkAmcIMkP/pVTL2uItQW2ZRUmtBjs1kdm9pI79q6mfTHQwlofNF58y2xT /HBOOSpa1D3TkRzmJ4ZAyViNx6NPR018nd4PcMbL/xNxRSmkMGhpoySl3wSBbVt3 DnRU2cG87hOjElg8BmA5e8Z6J09vCFrevr4+WzcGYuSjEEPQxZ2ZhxY9j4lHK/et SJ2B0Dt2haIBjmv/YK2ywEF/4rCPuZb2/NAx/1z8a7mmm0KBLQR244CLo6nWhp3j SuoRWfOGC9fAxEToIL87sdhwcjBJU2EpFFDlZwthikedb8S23oztl8YAKjFk2FE4 3Q6oiU3JuD1tsUty6rMk5SIi6FB/uMjnUbj222rgNYWGWWGLWRotszyioRrAVCGE UsiMdvrGItIoaTKifryM1LIZFIj/ZWlKhWMuQ2BWjMhFPZ8PCvez4tAzzhU3r7hx +wDDXMiD0vp8YvtRP5JCDvuif1ycQ5SdeQs2OXzQzUGwuqDBJlJVl/NwBJK3kZGn 9wRrbJ2NCf8bf5UYYEu1 =WyR9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2024690.ud9DsC8oiF--