From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SI3iM-0006Ip-6d for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 20:00:26 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 14BE0E0E75; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 19:59:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38577E0E07 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 19:58:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (87-205-54-245.adsl.inetia.pl [87.205.54.245]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 31C141B4009; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 19:58:35 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 21:58:47 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: williamh@gentoo.org, council@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] >= udev-182 tracker Message-ID: <20120411215847.6993e0a8@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <20120411195345.GA19071@linux1> References: <20120411195345.GA19071@linux1> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; boundary="Sig_/+zUfN=z5ctIA4h3Rn6OWIH7"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: aa3c98a8-e897-40dd-b457-681759cef1fe X-Archives-Hash: 2ce975eb12e5445801cfbf0c1fffb392 --Sig_/+zUfN=z5ctIA4h3Rn6OWIH7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:53:45 -0500 William Hubbs wrote: > All, >=20 > here is what I see on the current udev situation: >=20 > The council has made a decision that we will continue supporting > split out /usr.=20 >=20 > This, however, was never in question. No one is planning to drop > support for separate /usr. Also, no one is planning on trying to force > stabilize udev-182 within 30 days. >=20 > To allay any fears of that happening, I have opened a tracker [1] for > issues which need to be resolved before newer udevs can go stable. >=20 > Does this answer any fears about trying to force an untimely > stabilization? Maybe we should create a new mailing list, say, gentoo-usr-discussion@lists.gentoo.org. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/+zUfN=z5ctIA4h3Rn6OWIH7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQEIAAYFAk+F4ngACgkQfXuS5UK5QB3yiQP/SMQHEiapH4N1/IPAh7EGO3EU ZFjQdOKQuQxOOW1MkRXgso0wxvjbGjD67YUIqbC13U1U2tbM3kCFk1hyv7DfDyEs QhdjwzNeUqu8/uH1nuvyxbQ331Y0FIFaA14w3gyN3I83QCscokqh6+RhsHB6a/XH 4XlJTUVh/ovL0TkGKQg= =jjYb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/+zUfN=z5ctIA4h3Rn6OWIH7--