From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-50931-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1SI3ct-0005Uz-Pq
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 19:54:48 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 36735E0D48;
	Wed, 11 Apr 2012 19:54:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ob0-f181.google.com (mail-ob0-f181.google.com [209.85.214.181])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFF2DE0BFA
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 19:53:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by obbwd20 with SMTP id wd20so1925356obb.40
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:53:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to
         :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:user-agent;
        bh=MGMSBZfH3JlBvqKiYQADTIIWks2ZSmKG2mvPFJodyJw=;
        b=iF37PznOw6tscttg+JjW1D2QoVPtSXF8etfqNPJYNMMH61sl5HkOdz0BfDxq1WYJzr
         wZO5mcKHXs6M6t4o3LZv383nd0Qz50FTusaRD9I+AFkxEDsSu2PQ7CxyUbwgrSRgmCKA
         qu28EWb8r0W2E3ISz83lPNvpVwYYUI0xoJpNDbnny4JHdt4d4G4O98sPktsd/QpIEWSG
         CNucrtCPtqYydGBrZN7KZN62EsM3nXLaejKtV8GMnD5NwBqCT1jxigNzHiPJiVkM0CoN
         BU6YqviHtYDt0+BcykXEXXi46ASAvwpsBVfqZavUk16qyUgRgsT27B4hmuI62LEbtSzL
         G+TA==
Received: by 10.182.119.101 with SMTP id kt5mr21900429obb.70.1334174028295;
        Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:53:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-187-77-158.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.77.158])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id il8sm3892908obc.18.2012.04.11.12.53.46
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:53:47 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: William Hubbs <w.d.hubbs@gmail.com>
Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:53:45 -0500
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:53:45 -0500
From: William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo development <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Cc: council@gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] >= udev-182 tracker
Message-ID: <20120411195345.GA19071@linux1>
Mail-Followup-To: gentoo development <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>,
	council@gentoo.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5vNYLRcllDrimb99"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Archives-Salt: c6d68a52-388c-46ee-b3fa-449abdfc25f0
X-Archives-Hash: 015e73cfccbd72fa956a8bdbc2e9cdc0


--5vNYLRcllDrimb99
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

All,

here is what I see on the current udev situation:

The council has made a decision that we will continue supporting
split out /usr.=20

This, however, was never in question. No one is planning to drop support
for separate /usr. Also, no one is planning on trying to force
stabilize udev-182 within 30 days.

To allay any fears of that happening, I have opened a tracker [1] for
issues which need to be resolved before newer udevs can go stable.

Does this answer any fears about trying to force an untimely
stabilization?

William

[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D411627

--5vNYLRcllDrimb99
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk+F4UkACgkQblQW9DDEZThDCwCfV35YJtGvz5lrkBkL/q7E/vJL
dGQAn1BcTgs7iAmBKWpFwca9D75DHWX3
=Zgvc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--5vNYLRcllDrimb99--