From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SHqgP-0000yU-Kr for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 06:05:33 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DCE53E0D9C; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 06:05:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7B33E0C7D for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 06:04:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F0A31B4006 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 06:04:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.988 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.988 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-1.076, BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zv8bJQla3QRj for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 06:04:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82C801B4002 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 06:04:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SHqfC-0002TL-HP for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:04:18 +0200 Received: from 71-17-69-121.yktn.hsdb.sasknet.sk.ca ([71.17.69.121]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:04:18 +0200 Received: from dirtyepic by 71-17-69-121.yktn.hsdb.sasknet.sk.ca with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:04:18 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Ryan Hill Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: About how to handle wxGTK based packages with gnome profiles Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:12:55 -0600 Message-ID: <20120411001255.2829e937@gentoo.org> References: <1334041139.25951.7.camel@belkin4> <4F83DD50.5000803@gentoo.org> <1334089280.25951.8.camel@belkin4> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/9ZNiS8g1CYuDFKbqND3+x.e"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 71-17-69-121.yktn.hsdb.sasknet.sk.ca X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-Archives-Salt: 26f13a05-c5e9-4925-8bcd-0180adef9bc4 X-Archives-Hash: db3c441f14f018f611f22b66d1d45fc0 --Sig_/9ZNiS8g1CYuDFKbqND3+x.e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 22:21:20 +0200 Pacho Ramos wrote: > OK, looks like I misunderstood how wxwidgets work and most opinions > point to enable wxwidgets by default in gnome profiles, ok with that > solution? As I mentioned in the bug I'd like it default for desktop. There's nothing inherently "gnome" about wxwidgets other than the fact that it uses gtk+ widgets. If the idea is that you won't get any gui at all if wxwidgets isn= 't enabled (and I can't think of any packages where this isn't true) then kde users should be included too. --=20 fonts, gcc-porting toolchain, wxwidgets @ gentoo.org --Sig_/9ZNiS8g1CYuDFKbqND3+x.e Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk+FIOcACgkQiqiDRvmkBmJ/1QCfRdu/pkBASmG/sgYVdx1M0ijt PT8AoOrgETOaXQCAawX2ItvEyKqH8T8j =OPXq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/9ZNiS8g1CYuDFKbqND3+x.e--