From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-50915-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1SHiSp-0000G4-0V
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:18:59 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F2C1E0C4C;
	Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:18:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-gx0-f181.google.com (mail-gx0-f181.google.com [209.85.161.181])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27CBEE08B1
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:17:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ggnl1 with SMTP id l1so217849ggn.40
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:17:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
         :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to
         :user-agent;
        bh=nWePT9pBm2benp8fDtPWvc5W5rVVI3BuMpWl48h/JEQ=;
        b=ZXqjNlR+HXMQhqx/zvuAWwcRORnYHIxX0JH0wyx0NGvFE1fdXIsVRroZhta2195W8p
         UijsbPgBZjh5AV3CSa2QBw1WanjYciSIh04PWveQO/RzvrCtNRtanpYibAYPuB/r0BCX
         awDefckKw88bbAg2uk8WMDlvt8EBbKar3KkfclrMuVDrCjHIA3pVtUXykTBJuy/6Adxd
         Rx1arHaszUYEvB9LPK+sup2qNlW2AA1ZcEmiIVSF0uM+NRPnSB/xI2YAtqxe5WLNjOKd
         pwI731v+DCj6zH8hqn5LibHMgLvIk1eea2Xn5rIaw1jg2huy7vqIDHEpffZV02JPeC+0
         SykQ==
Received: by 10.60.26.231 with SMTP id o7mr18147041oeg.31.1334092667563;
        Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:17:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-187-77-158.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.77.158])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i6sm618013obv.5.2012.04.10.14.17.45
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:17:47 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: William Hubbs <w.d.hubbs@gmail.com>
Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:17:45 -0500
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:17:45 -0500
From: William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] pybugz call for testers
Message-ID: <20120410211745.GA9144@linux1>
Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
References: <20120410175425.GA8504@linux1>
 <4F849BDA.8030802@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="T4sUOijqQbZv57TR"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4F849BDA.8030802@gentoo.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Archives-Salt: 050ff72b-c40c-4f20-b263-70cad6e32c34
X-Archives-Hash: 9a0272f291da3712a979b67a0708a2eb


--T4sUOijqQbZv57TR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:45:14PM +0200, "Pawe=C5=82 Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> On 4/10/12 7:54 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > I have updated pybugz-9999 to work with the xmlrpc interface of
> > bugzilla.
>=20
> Cool, thank you for working on that.
>=20
> > I can name a couple of issues that are api limitations that we can't do
> > anything about:
> >=20
> > - you can't search on cc: or keywords fields.
>=20
> That's going to be a problem for arch testing needs (e.g. STABLEREQ
> keyword and x86@ cc-ed). How about doing the searches "the old way" that
> allowed the above.

That is not so easy to do since we have completely gotten rid of the old
method of communicating with bugzilla. That method was not reliable and
had broken several times with bugzilla upgrades, but using the web
services will be more stable.

Here is the documentation for their search command [1]. It would
probably be better for us to open a bug against bugzilla itself and
request those changes be put in the api.

What are your thoughts?

William

[1] http://www.bugzilla.org/docs/4.2/en/html/api/Bugzilla/WebService/Bug.ht=
ml#search

--T4sUOijqQbZv57TR
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk+Eo3kACgkQblQW9DDEZThSpQCdGnCAvmufFkdd9tyzCHbF7Lta
NgcAoJae8jbnMnBh5KIkrHaDvckcirUs
=/sW6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--T4sUOijqQbZv57TR--