From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SHh7Q-0002Wi-It for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:52:52 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EDA2DE0BF1; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:52:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C31DE0B82 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:51:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74BAE1B4002 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:51:00 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.14 for stable Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:51:33 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.4.0-rc1; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <201204101535.40321.vapier@gentoo.org> <29004602.E3mRPZ5On9@devil> In-Reply-To: <29004602.E3mRPZ5On9@devil> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1449653.lhKompCCWQ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201204101551.34228.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 751300f6-2474-4963-97da-5b2af243eb7b X-Archives-Hash: 199a6d7c730d108418e665c2a5a2f4d6 --nextPart1449653.lhKompCCWQ Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tuesday 10 April 2012 15:44:05 Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > On Tuesday 10 April 2012 15:35:39 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > there's one known bug (with a patch posted), so if you guys have anythi= ng > > that'd block glibc-2.14 for stable, nows' the time to file the bugs (and > > mark it a blocker of 370409). >=20 > I'd say to proceed directly in 393477 not really sure what you're referring to here. that bug is already fixed i= n=20 latest glibc-2.14 ebuild. =2Dmike --nextPart1449653.lhKompCCWQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJPhI9GAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBNLcP/2SQj0SFXoVDLcigX3MmfF7+ Lzs3xt3WLnpN0DINlFXBVof62tSuKg9ScW4QlSmJ0HDtorhZzHUCquNIkbfxXnRe os/+80geGL3VWwB6ESn49oxGF9kQSA53GU/GZKlRyjIOGYm3gVP4y5rhvd7VdlC3 z5dLwjGQ6koFgW4dLqFjh/qpT4aSbgDbV7WBikdnitvyTGXUbqhEKc8nq8+rH7uG nH5OJjhXl0D9C94vSmpKp4lj5ZJ4J4U6iRMTlv0wYVgKM8d7Gk/DhLYx6l+KunoO Aq/1V8eY+LAhQea3c0tKwg52Jlmk9HzwA7PyXv4TIwnB0UZ5cTlxBYKUZAu/9/+V dzS3Ozd3tiu/g91hPgMGjl8H4hh2t8ZstMfHfcs3dYXwz4vZ6vwPyFGugyQIw+yg J4ifwATb7ESE8cwegp7F1ca5UR5Vf6ghKR6E6HRGU90Krv1X3Ady9RhD0ycX7Yyb /CaUFbLr89Ex7wibSc0QQrZi0VcJrhs95PXQZjemX2cnmyvgiblcDkE9TAevnrKM WLYkrOJflwK7u2hfJoH7lRw8sMm+k7Ckjd26TMTLcuseAzhUicrPach9l2h+8t5o s9cXRSGRYzLd1Yp3SwbCyIbxGEeS6VZJWJPgsdKIqx59SmN2xX6ERGLakys3C6HX p/f2uvQlOKe4q+SxKzuR =LQf9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1449653.lhKompCCWQ--