From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SERhO-0002Hv-Eo for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 01 Apr 2012 20:48:31 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A9E14E0AFA; Sun, 1 Apr 2012 20:48:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 388E4E0A5A for ; Sun, 1 Apr 2012 20:47:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (213-238-103-113.adsl.inetia.pl [213.238.103.113]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6C07F64C5D; Sun, 1 Apr 2012 20:47:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2012 22:47:23 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Should ${T} be defined in pkg_prepare ? Message-ID: <20120401224723.3aa9f94c@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <20120401195544.45f95b27@googlemail.com> References: <4F76F44A.4020409@gmail.com> <20120401195544.45f95b27@googlemail.com> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; boundary="Sig_/Z=9DPMUWspEDpSWRiPV3jd2"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 739164ac-bbbe-48b2-80b1-868fb74ff810 X-Archives-Hash: dbe7f0e8e32db9b8f2884c47d51c3c56 --Sig_/Z=9DPMUWspEDpSWRiPV3jd2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 19:55:44 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 14:10:50 +0200 > Maciej Grela wrote: > > I've read the PMS and I haven't found information whether this > > variable is supposed to be set during pkg_prepare or not. Therefore > > I ask, what is the proper behaviour here ? Is there documentation on > > what special env variables are supposed to be defined in each > > stage ? Can this be considered as a bug in paludis ? >=20 > Mmm. The spec implies that it should be set to something sane... > There's no guarantee, of course, that the amount of space in ${T} in > pkg_pretend is anything like the amount of space that will be > available for the build, but check-reqs is deliberately designed to > be wildly inaccurate. Yes because being wildly accurate in this case is such a great possibility here. Why don't you delight us with your vision of wildly accurate space prediction, mister? --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/Z=9DPMUWspEDpSWRiPV3jd2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQEIAAYFAk94vuEACgkQfXuS5UK5QB3qLwP8Dz/7dg0bfCyfGtJFJs2amdJ8 RpGSBSJ1pZZgvtjvP6uqM6MIGGTx7oaTalZR6UBLaMsDBfOEOEGb+tqkSU/0sd+I VabJAM5mtMhGqOCx6V1WcMk6vUOngGhOdl4wKGA6LzMihUfFZW6UdHvFXdzOPgNc UZ6z+Ccj/q96w4X8KfU= =eJdI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/Z=9DPMUWspEDpSWRiPV3jd2--