From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SDtDV-00089t-HY for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 07:59:21 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7FC43E0DD2; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 07:59:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com (mail-we0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED1D5E0C9D for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 07:58:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by werm13 with SMTP id m13so855216wer.40 for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 00:58:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; bh=ZH2qSKZD4WaylZWp0OFCAuOxHsCQDmWh+jHkmXjkcEs=; b=K2nqtWU9YkOjrUcEBpYC+RpEGrvPIdssDSi1fWlMj51mtwQNusiqk3dKncIEffd246 xA1j21p8dJCR8hZwF6L++W8FzfrQNY/hq+jhJfrCSUC2A4YJpq6HxuV3jjT4697+hrVz jtt3kSQvODN4snDTYYPy+ik/tcj0kjXGQmtmLmIq1UfiNgOfGEGSSCN19ES/wwf00abe 4IlNnk9AtDP/a+M33SONkwWEAOMBiLOVx4zPH8kruLI0ZuE20VOTlWzrEzw1jxIP5k0A dp4PDrIvAO8Qf5BcjIQbE1G+dC5sIoPS9pN31NQ10r82Jjdtu9ECKVNw3gWM8z6AvnkC FAmA== Received: by 10.180.82.136 with SMTP id i8mr4195661wiy.19.1333180683187; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 00:58:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (host-92-22-252-224.as13285.net. [92.22.252.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 6sm13580975wiz.1.2012.03.31.00.58.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 31 Mar 2012 00:58:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 08:56:22 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Happy 10th birthday (in advance) Message-ID: <20120331085622.5650ca62@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <4F762BCF.9010204@cs.stonybrook.edu> References: <20120330150041.c3f7684c.axel@james-b.ch> <4F75B45F.2050108@gentoo.org> <4F76226B.1020507@gentoo.org> <4F762BCF.9010204@cs.stonybrook.edu> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/Igpqj6t+g5bUzyOLnF=OgIn"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: ec74546c-c791-4142-a1e9-824cae3e808f X-Archives-Hash: eb91517f11c3cbb6c4c72d73b7df3446 --Sig_/Igpqj6t+g5bUzyOLnF=OgIn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 17:55:27 -0400 Richard Yao wrote: > I think we should wait for Portage 2.2 to be stabilized before we > declare Gentoo 2.0. @preserved-libs is enough of an advance that I > think claiming 2.0 would be merited, if only for the attention it > would draw at Phoronix. Do you really want to be advertising an awful hack that doesn't really work, is conceptually unsound and that breaks all kinds of things in subtle ways? --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/Igpqj6t+g5bUzyOLnF=OgIn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk92uKkACgkQ96zL6DUtXhFF7QCgsv69sDNZ5/IPoA+b+jaTazY8 LZAAoJIeA/7qPy0gbPV48aeLJuHl4MLN =rh6A -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/Igpqj6t+g5bUzyOLnF=OgIn--