Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: virtual/shadow

[Fabian Groffen <grobian@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1029 bytes --]

On 12-03-2012 11:35:43 +0100, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> On 3/12/12 11:27 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > My rsync0 now spits out this message:
> > 
> >   Virtual package in package.provided: virtual/shadow-0
> >   See portage(5) for correct package.provided usage.
> > 
> > I did not forsee this happening, but each and every Prefix user now gets
> > this complaint on each and every emerge invocation.  It does not seem to
> > block any operation, but could we perhaps hold back further changes
> > until I can sort this out with Zac?
> 
> Ah, I read portage(5) now and adding a virtual to package.provided is
> indeed explicitly prohibited.
> 
> I removed it, but some further changes might be required for prefix
> (i.e. version number >= 4.1 in package.provided to satisfy the virtual),
> and I'll indeed hold back further changes in that area,
> and preferably just let you do any necessary fixes for prefix.

Thanks a lot for your swift actions!


-- 
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]