From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1S6gEB-0006Tb-Si for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 10:42:16 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A019E0764; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 10:42:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62A00E074E for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 10:41:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (159-205-88-242.adsl.inetia.pl [159.205.88.242]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C31801B4013; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 10:41:33 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 11:43:56 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: neil@digimed.co.uk Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: unmasking udev-181 Message-ID: <20120311114356.4c06c151@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <20120311093624.45ab11c6@digimed.co.uk> References: <20120311022706.GA26296@linux1> <20120311080635.504de0e3@digimed.co.uk> <20120311094102.3f39f753@pomiocik.lan> <20120311093624.45ab11c6@digimed.co.uk> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; boundary="Sig_/zJj0Warw.Nq0ZXZ8wv4n1uI"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: c2aa0d4c-7ace-4fbb-bb9c-3eb304183f4f X-Archives-Hash: b16cfb6a708c7e090565d89d5abf103e --Sig_/zJj0Warw.Nq0ZXZ8wv4n1uI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 09:36:24 +0000 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 09:41:02 +0100, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: >=20 > > > A major change like this needs more notice than this. The news > > > item should give some reasonable notice of the change to give > > > people time to get their initramfs setup working and tested > > > before it is needed in anger. =20 > >=20 > > Maybe the ebuild should try to autodetect broken systems and prevent > > merge then. >=20 > I use an initramfs, it does not mount /usr. The initramfs is embedded > in the kernel file. How would the ebuild evaluate that? It would just say 'You seem to have separate /usr. Please ensure you have a working initramfs which mounts it, and set FOOBARBAZ=3Dyes in your make.conf then'. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/zJj0Warw.Nq0ZXZ8wv4n1uI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQEIAAYFAk9cge0ACgkQfXuS5UK5QB2zLQQAjey5P4iDsQeUeXzJ+OLGVgxQ WUjIH+yVacdhrkXgjF0McAVB0u90EoAo+ViKHeXGZTDix1V4fXXboD+9syspxBW9 Y8z7YEDRmR+j4/NcpbuNdZRBXWbbNaWDw9bzZrFoNLSgkstpCmJqiqz4AvdDhUg5 g8wQpXxBoYDi/gd7oAM= =ix9D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/zJj0Warw.Nq0ZXZ8wv4n1uI--